[2021] KEELC 282 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 282 (KLR)

The court determined that the substance of the applicant's request—to compel the Governor to release a report for public scrutiny—does not constitute a dispute relating to environment and land as required by Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act. Although the application references land, the core issue is...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 282 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: John Wekesa Khaoya (Chief Executive Officer, Centre for Human Rights Organization); Defendant: His Excellency Wycliffe Wafula Wangamati (The Governor Bungoma County)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 18 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Preliminary Order on Jurisdiction and Transfer
Outcome
Application transferred to the High Court for further directions.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Court, Transfer of Proceedings
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of Court Transfer of Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Wekesa Khaoya (Chief Executive Officer, Centre for Human Rights Organization)

Applicant

His Excellency Wycliffe Wafula Wangamati (The Governor Bungoma County)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Preliminary Order on Jurisdiction and Transfer

  1. 1 Does the Environment and Land Court have jurisdiction to determine an application seeking to compel the Governor to release a land inventory report for public scrutiny.
  2. 2 Should the application be struck out or transferred to a court with proper jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the substance of the applicant's request—to compel the Governor to release a report for public scrutiny—does not constitute a dispute relating to environment and land as required by Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act. Although the application references land, the core issue is access to a report, not a dispute over land or environmental matters. Therefore, the Environment and Land Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the application. Instead of striking out the application, the court exercised its discretion to transfer the matter to the High Court, which is the proper forum to determine the issues raised.

Court Disposition

Application transferred to the High Court for further directions.

Orders

  • The application is transferred to the High Court and to be placed before Kemei J for further directions.