[2005] KEHC 3132 (KLR)
The court found that the delay in prosecuting the application to set aside the arbitration award was not due to the applicant's fault but was occasioned by the loss or misplacement of the original court file. The court held that it would be fair and just to allow the applicant to withdraw the defective application...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 3132 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Johnson Githaiga Kiragu; Respondent: Macharia Kiragu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 202 of 1980
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to Withdraw and File Fresh Application to Set Aside Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- application granted in part
- Judges
- GG Okwengu
- Legal Topics
- Arbitration Award Setting Aside, Withdrawal of Application, Delay in Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Johnson Githaiga Kiragu
Appellant
Macharia Kiragu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to Withdraw and File Fresh Application to Set Aside Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to withdraw the application dated 1st November 1985 and file a fresh application to set aside the arbitration award.
- 2 Whether the delay in prosecuting the application is justified given the missing court file.
- 3 Whether granting leave would cause injustice to the respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the delay in prosecuting the application to set aside the arbitration award was not due to the applicant's fault but was occasioned by the loss or misplacement of the original court file. The court held that it would be fair and just to allow the applicant to withdraw the defective application and file a fresh one, as this would not cause injustice to the respondent, who would still have the opportunity to respond. The court emphasized the importance of giving parties an opportunity to be heard on the merits, especially where procedural defects and administrative mishaps have impeded progress. Accordingly, the court granted the application for leave to withdraw and...
Court Disposition
application granted in part
Orders
- Leave is granted to the applicant to withdraw the application dated 1st November 1985.
- The applicant is granted leave to file a fresh application to set aside the arbitration award within 15 days from the date of this ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NYERI
Civil Case 202 of 1980
JOHNSON GITHAIGA KIRAGU …………………....…………………. APPELLANT
VERSUS
MACHARIA KIRAGU ………………………………………….……. RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
By a notice of motion dated 1st November 1985 filed in High Court Miscellaneous application number 87 of 1979, Macharia Kiragu (hereinafter referred to as the applicant) moved this court under Order XLV rules 13, 14 & 15 of the civil Procedure Rules for orders to set aside the arbitration award which was read in court on the 2nd day of October 1985 and a further order for the suit to proceed to hearing on its merits before the court.
On 3rd May 2005, that application was listed for hearing in this file which has apparently been consolidated with High Court Misc. Application No. 87 of 1979. It turned out however that the affidavit in support of the application was defective not having been attested. The court therefore expunged from the record the affidavit as being defective. The court further directed that the applicant makes a formal application for leave to withdraw the application dated 1st November 1985 and leave to file another application.
Consequently the applicant filed a notice of motion dated 29th June 2005 seeking leave to withdraw the application dated 1st November 1985 and leave to file another application to set aside the arbitration award filed in the court dated 2nd October 1985. As per the grounds stated on the body of the application, it is stated that the original file pertaining to this suit was misplaced or lost and that there is no order for referral to arbitration dated 11th May 1984 in the current file, nor is there any indication whether period for filing award was extended.
Mr. K. Wachira who appeared for the Respondent has no objection to the withdrawal of the application dated 1st November 1985 but strenuously objects to the court granting leave to the applicant to file another application for setting aside the award as no leave has been sought to file the application out of time. He maintains that the applicant has not explained the delay of over 20 years.
He maintains that the order for referral was erroneously made in High Court Misc. Application No. 87 of 1979 (which was an application to have file i.e. S.R.M.C.C. 175 of 1977 transferred to the High Court). A copy of the referral order is annexed to the replying affidavit sworn by the Respondent. Mr. Wachira therefore urged the court to dismiss the application.
It is evident from the above, that the applicant’s application for setting aside the arbitration award was filed about 20 years ago as the same was filed on 1st November 1985. The impression being created that there has been a delay of 20 years is therefore erroneous. It is evident that the original substantive file H.C.C.C. No. 202 of 1980 has been missing and this obviously affected the pace at which the proceedings moved.
Although it is alleged that the reference to arbitration was made in High Court Misc. Application No. 87 of 1979. I only have a skeleton file in respect of that application, which file does not contain the referral order of 11th May 1984. I can therefore appreciate the handicap that the appellant is in. In the circumstances it is only fair and just that the applicant be granted leave to file his application for setting aside the arbitration award so that he can have an opportunity of being heard. Moreover no injustice will be caused to the Respondent as he will have the opportunity to respond to and object to the application.
I do therefore grant the application dated 29th June 2005. The applicant to file his application within 15 days from the date hereof.
Costs of the application dated 1st November 1985 to the Respondent.
Orders accordingly.
Dated signed and delivered this 23rd day of November 2005
H. M. OKWENGU
JUDGE