[2018] KEHC 6299 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant was 22 years old at the time of sentencing, as evidenced by his National Identity Card indicating a birth year of 1996. Section 67 of the Prisons Act restricts committal to a youth corrective training centre to persons who have attained the age of 17 but not yet 21. The trial...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 6299 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Johnson Mbuvi Nguva; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kitui
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 113 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
- Outcome
- sentence set aside and substituted with term served; applicant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held
- Judges
- LN Mutende
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Error, Youth Corrective Training Centre, Age Verification, Revision Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Johnson Mbuvi Nguva
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was lawfully sentenced to the Kamiti Youth Correctional and Training Centre despite being above the statutory age limit.
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed by the trial court was erroneous and should be revised.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was 22 years old at the time of sentencing, as evidenced by his National Identity Card indicating a birth year of 1996. Section 67 of the Prisons Act restricts committal to a youth corrective training centre to persons who have attained the age of 17 but not yet 21. The trial magistrate erred by sentencing the applicant to such an institution. The High Court, exercising its revisionary jurisdiction under Sections 362 and 363 of the Criminal Procedure Code, set aside the sentence as unlawful and substituted it with a sentence of the term already served, ordering the applicant's immediate release unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
sentence set aside and substituted with term served; applicant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held
Orders
- The sentence committing the applicant to Kamiti Youth Correctional and Training Centre is set aside.
- The applicant's sentence is reduced to the term already served.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KITUI
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO. 113 OF 2018
JOHNSON MBUVI NGUVA.....................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC.............................................................RESPONDENT
(Arising from the sentence and order in Mwingi Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court Criminal Case No. 36 of 2018 by G. W. Kirugumi S R M on 13/04/18)
R U L I N G
1. By a letter dated the 17thday of April, 2018, C. K. Nzili Advocatesseek Revision of an order by Hon. G. W. Kirugumi,Senior Resident Magistrate, Mwingi. It is premised on the ground that the Applicant who was charged with the offence of Stealing Stock(a he-goat valued at Kshs. 4,500/=)was erroneously sentenced to serve four monthsat Kamiti Youth Correctional and Training Centre,an institution that admits people between 17and 21years, yet, the Applicant is 22 years old.This, according to the Applicant is an error on the face of the record that should be subjected to Revision.
2. The file was forwarded by the trial Magistrate who stated that she was misguided by the information availed by the Probation Officer who carried out the inquiry.
3. I am duty bound to re-consider the Lower Court record and come up with my own conclusion.
4. I have perused a report filed by the Probation Officer who recommended committal of the Applicant (Offender) to the Kamiti Youth Correctional and Training Centre(KYCTC) for a period of four (4) months.
5. Section 67of the Prisons Actprovides thus:
“(1) Notwithstanding the provisions of any other written law, where a person, who has attained the apparent age of seventeen years but has not attained the apparent age of twenty-one years, is convicted of an offence not punishable with death, the court may sentence such person to corrective training in a youth corrective training centre for a period of four months:
Provided that no person shall be sentenced to corrective training in a youth corrective training centre—
(i) if he has previously been detained in prison, a detention camp as defined in the Detention Camps Act (Cap. 91) (now repealed), an approved school as defined in the Children and Young Persons Act (Cap. 141) (now repealed), or a borstal institution as defined in the Borstal Institutions Act (Cap. 92); or
(ii) if he has previously been sentenced to corrective training in a youth corrective training centre; or
(iii) for failure to pay any tax or rate under the Personal Tax Act (Cap. 470): Provided further that no person shall be sentenced to corrective training in a youth corrective training centre unless the court is satisfied that accommodation for such person is available in a youth corrective training centre.
(2) Every person sentenced to corrective training in a youth corrective training centre shall be deemed to be a prisoner for the purposes of this Act, including remission of sentence.”
6. Although no birth certificate, or evidence of age was adduced in evidence, an inquiry carried out by the Social Officer indicated that the offender was 21 years oldhaving been born in 1996according to his National Identity Card. Had the learned Magistrate considered the fact that the offender held a National Identity bearing the year of birth of the offender as 1996then she should have reached a finding that at the time of commission of the offence the offender was 22 years old.
7. Persons eligible to be sentenced to the Youth Correctional Centre must have attained the age of seventeen years but below the age of 21 years. Sentencing the Applicant to undertake training at the Centre was therefore erroneous.
8. In the circumstances, the sentence meted out was incorrect. Therefore in accordance with Section 362and 363of the Criminal Procedure CodeI do set aside the sentence. The Applicant was supposed to be incarcerated for four (4) months.He has been in custody for a duration of one and a half months.Therefore I reduce the sentence to the term served. Consequently, he shall be released forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.
9. It is so ordered.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Kitui this 21st day of May, 2018.
L. N. MUTENDE
JUDGE