[2019] KEELC 783 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioners had established a prima facie case for the grant of an injunction, as the 2nd respondent had not opposed the application and there was evidence of ongoing developments on the suit land that could prejudice the rights of the petitioners if not restrained. To maintain the status...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 783 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Johnson Mwero & 5 Others; Defendant: The Office of the Public Trustee; Applicant: Simon Ndegwa Mwero; Applicant: Victoria Mzije Johnson Mkala; Appellant: Interested Party (not named)
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 19 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications (injunction and Joinder)
- Outcome
- Applications for injunction and joinder allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Joinder of Parties, Beneficiary Rights, Succession Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Johnson Mwero & 5 Others
Plaintiff
The Office of the Public Trustee
Defendant
Simon Ndegwa Mwero
Applicant
Victoria Mzije Johnson Mkala
Applicant
Interested Party (not named)
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications (injunction and Joinder)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioners are entitled to an injunction restraining the 2nd respondent from interfering with the suit land pending determination of the suit.
- 2 Whether Simon Ndegwa Mwero and Victoria Mzije Johnson Mkala should be enjoined as interested parties in the proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioners had established a prima facie case for the grant of an injunction, as the 2nd respondent had not opposed the application and there was evidence of ongoing developments on the suit land that could prejudice the rights of the petitioners if not restrained. To maintain the status quo and prevent further interference, the court granted the injunction against the 2nd respondent pending the hearing and determination of the suit. Regarding the application for joinder, the court held that Simon Ndegwa Mwero and Victoria Mzije Johnson Mkala had demonstrated a sufficient interest in the subject matter as alleged beneficiaries of the estate and that their...
Court Disposition
Applications for injunction and joinder allowed.
Orders
- An injunction is granted restraining the 2nd respondent from making developments, erecting structures, or entering into any dispositions on the suit property pending hearing and determination of the suit.
- Simon Ndegwa Mwero and Victoria Mzije Johnson Mkala are enjoined as 2nd and 3rd interested parties in the proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT
AT MOMBASA
PET NO. 19 OF 2019
JOHNSON MWERO & 5 OTHERS..................................................PLAINITFFS
VERSUS
THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE & 2 OTHERS........DEFENDANTS
RULING
(Application seeking orders of injunction; petitioners claiming to be beneficiaries of suit land and alleging interference from the 2nd respondent; no response filed by 2nd respondent; application allowed; second application by some persons seeking to be enjoined as interested parties; applicants also claiming to be beneficiaries of the suit land; application allowed)
1. This suit was commenced through a Constitutional Petition claiming a contravention of various rights enshrined in the Constitution including the right to own property under Article 40. The petitioners are sons and daughters of the late Peter Johnson Mwero and Elizabeth Johnson Mwero who were registered as proprietors of the land parcel Kwale/Mwavumbo/46 later subdivided into Kwale/Mwavumbo/179. It is averred that the 1st respondent, the Public Trustee, was appointed on 28 May 2007 to administer the estate of the deceased together with the interested party. The petitioners aver that on 1 May 2019, they discovered a group of unknown persons having unlawfully entered the suit land and commenced some excavation and developments. It is pleaded that the interested party has denied having given consent to the said developments. It is contended that the petitioners sought assistance from the 1st respondent who ignored them and failed to intervene hence rendering this petition necessary. The petitioners state that they later discovered that it is the 2nd respondent who is undertaking the developments. In the suit, they want the 2nd respondent permanently restrained from the land alongside various declarations regarding their rights over the suit property.
2. Together with the petition, the petitioners filed an application for an injunction to restrain the 2nd respondent from interfering with the suit land, making any developments, or dealing with it. While that application was pending, an application dated 1 October 2019 was filed by two persons, namely Simon Ndegwa Mwero and Victoria Mzije Johnson Mkala. In the application, they have sought leave to come into this suit as 2nd and 3rd interested parties. They claim to be beneficiaries of the estate of the late Johnson Mkala Mwero and Elizabeth Johnson Mwero. Each has sworn an affidavit to support their application to be allowed in this suit as interested party. Simon Ndegwa Mwero has deposed that he is one of the beneficiaries of the late Johnson Mkala Mwero and the late Elizabeth Johnson Mwero, whose estates are the subject of proceedings in Mombasa Succession Causes No. 27 of 1987 and 82 of 2003 respectively. He has averred that he is their biological son. He has deposed that this petition was commenced without him being informed or consulted. He believes that the petition is aimed at disinheriting him in particular. He has further stated that he has certain information that will shed light on the ownership of the substratum of the suit. He has also accused the petitioners and the interested party of intermeddling in the estate of the deceased. More or less similar depositions were made by Victoria Mzije Johnson Mwero in her supporting affidavit where she has averred that she is daughter of the deceased.
3. On the first application, that is of injunction, this is primarily aimed at the 2nd respondent. He has not filed anything to oppose the motion. So that status quo may be maintained, I will allow the application for injunction and order that the 2nd respondent should not make any developments or any structures on the suit property, or enter into any dispositions, pending the hearing and determination of this suit. I award the costs of the application to the petitioners as against the 2nd respondent.
4. On the application for joinder as interested parties, the petitioners do not oppose the same. I therefore allow the said application and the two persons are enjoined as 2nd and 3rd interested parties. There will be no orders as to costs on this application for joinder.
5. Orders accordingly.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at MOMBASA this 13th day of November 2019.
_______________
MUNYAO SILA,
JUDGE.
IN THE PRESENCE OF:
Ms. Olouch Wambi for the petitioners/applicants.
Mr Makuto holding brief fro Mr Maliro for the 1st & 3rd respondents.
Mr. Chebukaka holding brief for Mr Opulu for the interested party.
Mr. Wampy present for the 2nd & 3rd intended interested parties/applicants.
Court assistant; David Koitamet.