[2021] KEHC 2124 (KLR)
The court held that its revisionary jurisdiction under sections 362 and 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code does not extend to sentences imposed by the High Court, but only to those imposed by subordinate courts. Furthermore, the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Muruatetu is only applicable to cases where the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 2124 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Johnstone Muluila Mbati; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Makueni
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E021 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Sentence Review Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- GMA Dulu
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Review, Revision Jurisdiction, Murder Conviction, Appellate Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Johnstone Muluila Mbati
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Sentence Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to review a sentence imposed in a murder conviction under section 362 and 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- 2 Whether the Supreme Court decision in Francis Muruatetu applies to sentences other than the mandatory death sentence.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to sentence review where a 30-year imprisonment sentence was imposed instead of the mandatory death sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that its revisionary jurisdiction under sections 362 and 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code does not extend to sentences imposed by the High Court, but only to those imposed by subordinate courts. Furthermore, the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Muruatetu is only applicable to cases where the mandatory death sentence has been imposed. Since the applicant was sentenced to 30 years imprisonment and not the mandatory death sentence, the Muruatetu decision does not apply. Therefore, the application for sentence review is not merited and must be dismissed. The applicant, however, retains the right to appeal to the Court of Appeal against both conviction and sentence.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for sentence review is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MAKUENI
HC. MISC. CR. APPLICATION NO. E021 OF 2021
JOHNSTONE MULUILA MBATI ...............................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC...............................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Before me is a Notice of Motion filed by the applicant under section 169(1) and section 362 and 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code, as well as Article 22(1), 23(1), 25(a), (c), 29, 50and 165(3) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010, together with section 203 and section 204 of the Penal Code.
2. It is an application for sentence review, based on the reasoning and directions given by the Supreme Court in the now famous case of Francis Muruatetu & Another –vs- Republic, Supreme Court Petition No. 15 of 2015 and 16 of 2015.
3. In the present application, the applicant seeks review of the sentence imposed on him in Makueni High Court Criminal Case No. 74 of 2017 wherein he was convicted of murder and sentenced to serve 30 years in prison.
4. The application proceeded by way of filing written submissions and I have perused and considered the written submissions of both the applicant and the Director of Public Prosecutions.
5. I will start by saying that the review jurisdiction of this court under section 362 and 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code (cap.75) is discretionary and applies only to correct mistakes of law or procedure committed by subordinate courts, not the High Court. The said revision powers also do not apply where the applicant has right of appeal.
6. Having considered this matter, I am of the view that the reasoning in the Muruatetu case, indeed, confers on this court powers to revise sentence even where the decision has been appealed to the highest court in Kenya. However, such powers are limited to situations where the mandatory death sentence has been imposed. In the present case however, the learned Judge sentenced the applicant to serve 30 years imprisonment, the Muruatetucase does not apply herein as the Judge did not impose the mandatory death sentence.
7. Thus this application is for dismissal. I hasten to add however, that the dismissal of this application does not remove the right of the applicant to appeal to the Court of Appeal against both conviction and sentence if he so wishes.
8. Coming back to this application, it is not merited and it is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
DELIVERED, SIGNED & DATED THIS 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021, IN OPEN COURT AT MAKUENI.
……………………………….
GEORGE DULU
JUDGE