[2015] KEELRC 1585 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 1585 (KLR)

The court found that the notice of appeal was filed out of time and no application for leave to file an appeal out of time had been lodged. As a result, there was no valid appeal before the court. Furthermore, the applicant failed to set out any grounds for the intended appeal or provide a draft memorandum of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELRC 1585 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Jonah Kimani Ngere; Respondent: Gear Control & Equipment Ltd.
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 893 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Appeal Procedure, Time Limits for Appeal
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Stay of Execution Appeal Procedure Time Limits for Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jonah Kimani Ngere

Claimant

Gear Control & Equipment Ltd.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the application for stay of execution pending appeal should be granted.
  2. 2 Whether the notice of appeal was filed within the prescribed time.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant has demonstrated that the intended appeal would be rendered nugatory if stay is not granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the notice of appeal was filed out of time and no application for leave to file an appeal out of time had been lodged. As a result, there was no valid appeal before the court. Furthermore, the applicant failed to set out any grounds for the intended appeal or provide a draft memorandum of appeal, making it impossible for the court to assess whether the intended appeal was arguable. The applicant also did not demonstrate that execution of the judgment would render the intended appeal nugatory, especially since the award was monetary. Consequently, the application for stay of execution pending appeal was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application for stay of execution pending appeal is dismissed with costs.