[2018] KEELRC 2092 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 2092 (KLR)

The court found that the hearing notice was served on Manthi Masika & Company Advocates, who were no longer the advocates on record for the respondent. The proper advocate on record was Mohammed Muigai Advocates. As a result, there was no proper service upon the respondent, rendering the proceedings of 23rd November...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 2092 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Jonah Munyao Musiku; Respondent: Athi River Mining Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 337 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Service and Vacation of Proceedings
Outcome
proceedings vacated; case to be heard de novo
Judges
DO Ogal
Legal Topics
Service of Process, Change of Advocates, Vacation of Proceedings
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Service of Process Change of Advocates Vacation of Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jonah Munyao Musiku

Claimant

Athi River Mining Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Service and Vacation of Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether proper service of hearing notice was effected on the respondent's advocate.
  2. 2 Whether the proceedings of 23rd November 2017 are defective for want of proper service.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the hearing notice was served on Manthi Masika & Company Advocates, who were no longer the advocates on record for the respondent. The proper advocate on record was Mohammed Muigai Advocates. As a result, there was no proper service upon the respondent, rendering the proceedings of 23rd November 2017 defective for want of proper service. The court therefore vacated the proceedings and directed that the case be heard de novo on a date to be fixed in court.

Court Disposition

proceedings vacated; case to be heard de novo

Orders

  • The proceedings of 23rd November 2017 are hereby vacated.
  • The case will be fixed for hearing de novo on a date to be fixed in court at the time of ruling.