[2018] KEELRC 2572 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 2572 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was employed under a fixed term contract which lawfully ended on its expiry date, as communicated by the respondent in advance. The Employment Act, 2007 permits fixed term contracts, and the end of such a contract on its terms does not constitute unfair termination. The claimant was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 2572 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Jonathan M. Waiganjo; Respondent: Unga Group Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 231 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Fixed Term Contracts, Termination of Employment, Notice Requirements, Collective Bargaining Agreements
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Fixed Term Contracts Termination of Employment Notice Requirements Collective Bargaining Agreements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jonathan M. Waiganjo

Claimant

Unga Group Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the claimant's employment constituted unfair termination under Kenyan law.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was entitled to notice pay, house allowance, leave travel allowance, retirement benefits, and compensation for unfair termination.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent complied with the applicable Collective Bargaining Agreement and statutory requirements.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was employed under a fixed term contract which lawfully ended on its expiry date, as communicated by the respondent in advance. The Employment Act, 2007 permits fixed term contracts, and the end of such a contract on its terms does not constitute unfair termination. The claimant was notified of the non-renewal, had no outstanding leave, and was paid gratuity as per the contract. Claims for notice pay, house allowance, leave travel allowance, and retirement benefits were not supported by the contract or applicable CBA for the relevant period. The absence of a defence or appearance by the respondent did not alter the legal position, as the evidence and law...

Court Disposition

claim dismissed

Orders

  • The entire claim is dismissed.
  • No orders as to costs.