[2022] KEHC 10177 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 10177 (KLR)

The court determined that it would not deliver the anticipated ruling on the applicant's request for judgment in terms of the Certificate of Costs until the respondent's application for enlargement of time to file a reference from taxation and for stay of proceedings was heard and determined. The court reasoned that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 10177 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jones Nyachiro t/a M/S Nyachiro Nyagaka & Company; Respondent: Nyamira County Government
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Case E001 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Directions on Interlocutory Applications; Pending Determination of Applications Dated 13th June 2022 and 20th April 2022
Outcome
Directions issued; ruling on application for judgment in terms of Certificate of Costs deferred pending determination of respondent's application for enlargement of time and stay.
Judges
FA Ochieng
Legal Topics
Advocate Remuneration, Taxation of Costs, Enlargement of Time, Stay of Proceedings
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Advocate Remuneration Taxation of Costs Enlargement of Time Stay of Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jones Nyachiro t/a M/S Nyachiro Nyagaka & Company

Applicant

Nyamira County Government

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Directions on Interlocutory Applications; Pending Determination of Applications Dated 13th June 2022 and 20th April 2022

  1. 1 Whether the court should grant directions on the pending application for judgment in terms of the Certificate of Costs.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent should be allowed time to file a reference from taxation and stay the proceedings.
  3. 3 Whether the court should delay delivery of its ruling on the application dated 20th April 2022 pending determination of the respondent's application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that it would not deliver the anticipated ruling on the applicant's request for judgment in terms of the Certificate of Costs until the respondent's application for enlargement of time to file a reference from taxation and for stay of proceedings was heard and determined. The court reasoned that proceeding to grant judgment while a substantive challenge to the taxation was pending would prejudice the respondent. Directions were therefore issued to set timelines for the hearing and determination of the respondent's application, with the outcome of that application to determine the fate of the applicant's request for judgment.

Court Disposition

Directions issued; ruling on application for judgment in terms of Certificate of Costs deferred pending determination of respondent's application for enlargement of time and stay.

Orders

  • The respondent's application dated 13th June 2022 is fixed for mention on 7th July 2022 for further directions.
  • The applicant is to serve the respondents forthwith.