[2018] KEHC 8161 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 8161 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to provide any evidence, either by affidavit or otherwise, to support his assertions of concealment or exclusion from inheritance. The applicant did not comply with the court's directive to propose a mode of distribution or substantiate his claims. In the absence of evidence...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 8161 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joram Luvisia Simiyu; Respondent: William Wekesa Tumbo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Probate & Administration 359 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Probate Application / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
Application for revocation of grant dismissed; confirmed grant reinstated.
Judges
A Ali-Aroni
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Succession, Distribution of Estate
Source Language
en
Family and Children Revocation of Grant Succession Distribution of Estate

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joram Luvisia Simiyu

Applicant

William Wekesa Tumbo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Probate Application / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the confirmed grant was obtained fraudulently or by concealment of material facts.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant/objector was excluded from inheritance without justification.
  3. 3 Whether there was sufficient evidence to warrant revocation or annulment of the grant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to provide any evidence, either by affidavit or otherwise, to support his assertions of concealment or exclusion from inheritance. The applicant did not comply with the court's directive to propose a mode of distribution or substantiate his claims. In the absence of evidence and in the interest of justice, the court held that there was no basis to revoke the confirmed grant. The grant issued on 19th May 2014 was reinstated, and the application for revocation was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application for revocation of grant dismissed; confirmed grant reinstated.

Orders

  • The grant issued on 19th May 2014 is reinstated.
  • Application for revocation or annulment of grant is dismissed.