[2010] KEHC 1420 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution's case was supported by credible and expert evidence, including testimony from police officers, KRA officials, a government printer, and a document examiner, all of whom confirmed that the documents and stamps found on the appellant were forged and not issued by the relevant...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 1420 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Joram Meshak Malafu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 319 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Forgery, Making Document Without Authority, Evidence Evaluation, Expert Testimony
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joram Meshak Malafu
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was properly convicted for making documents without authority and forgery.
- 2 Whether the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt against the appellant.
- 3 Whether the appellant's explanation raised reasonable doubt as to his guilt.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution's case was supported by credible and expert evidence, including testimony from police officers, KRA officials, a government printer, and a document examiner, all of whom confirmed that the documents and stamps found on the appellant were forged and not issued by the relevant authorities. The items were recovered directly from the appellant's person during a lawful search. The appellant's unsworn statement did not raise any reasonable doubt as to his guilt, as he merely placed himself at the scene and failed to provide a plausible explanation for possession of the forged items. The court held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable...
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The conviction and sentence of the lower court are upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
(MILIMANI LAW COURTS)
Criminal Appeal 319 of 2009
(From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No. 857 of 2006 of the Chief Magistrate’s Court atNairobi)
JORAM MESHAK MALAFU………………………………..APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC…………………………………………………….RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
TheAppellant was charged with 7 counts in one charge sheet and was convicted on all of them.The counts are as follows:
Court 1 -Making Document without authority contrary to Section 357(9)
Count II – Similar charges
Count III -Similar charges
Count IV -Forgery of stamps C/o Section 352 (a)
Count V – Forgery
Count VI – Forgery of stamps.
The prosecution was represented by PW1PC Abdi Noor Osman.On9/5/07he was conducting search of some suspects his colleagues recovered a rubber stamp with a KRA label at Moroko Patrol base.We searched further and recovered 3 PSV.
(1)PSV No. E208234.
(2)PSV No G2 75953
(3)PSV No G2 78997
(4)Road Licence badge No. 3789 No. ORO 38218
The suspect was in the vehicle.They arrested and took him to Kamukunji Police Station.The suspect was the appellant.The rubber stamp was in his socks.The other documents were in his pockets.
PW2 was Lewi S. Lumuti who works with KRA Busia Insp. Otieno had visited office in Kitale on13/6/06requiring about our stamp. There are several discrepancies.PW1 is Peter Otaro.He said they were conducting searches.Thevehicle KAQ 571E travelling toWesternProvince.I searched a young passenger in his socks.I recovered a rubber stamp with a KAR badge.Also recovered from his jackets 2 blank PSV licence for drug and one for conductor.PW3 arrested him on5/5/06. PW4 works with KRA as revenue officer.
PW5 worked with KRA.PW6 worked with Government Printer publishing documents used by Government Departments.On5/6/06he confirmed by letter that the documents were not printed by Government Printer Exhibit 10 in the record.He was able to confirm because they had recorded several ………….. which did not appear in their records.
PW7 was a document examiner.PW8 was revenue officer who gave evidence.Thereafter the Appellant was called upon to defend himself.
Appellant gave unsworn statement and said on that date he was going home.There was a road block at Country Bus.They were ordered to alight.He saw an envelope on the ground he picked it and before he opened it he was arrested.Then the forged stamps were taken out he had been already arrested and taken to Moroto Patrol base and he was charged.He said he did not know who had dropped the stamps.He was convicted by Magistrate Bidali on9/2/2009and was sentenced by SPM Muketi. For sentence fine of Shs. 350,000/= in total.
I have considered that the evidence supporting prosecution is given by expert. Document examiners, handwriting examiners and that the appellant had no much to say except to place himself at the scene.
I find the prosecution conducted prosecution beyond reasonable doubt and I find the Appeal has no merit.The same is dismissed.
Dated and delivered atNairobithis 7th day of October 2010.
J. N. KHAMINWA
JUDGE