[2019] KEHC 9948 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had alleged compliance with the law by lodging his appeal within the prescribed time, but due to an error at the registry, the appeal could not be traced. Given the seriousness of the sentence (death penalty) and the timely filing of the present application, the court held that it...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 9948 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Joram Theuri Githaiga; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application 131 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- A Mabeya
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Robbery With Violence, Conviction and Sentence, Death Penalty
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joram Theuri Githaiga
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time against conviction and sentence for robbery with violence.
- 2 Whether the applicant had previously complied with the law in lodging an appeal within time but for an error at the registry.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had alleged compliance with the law by lodging his appeal within the prescribed time, but due to an error at the registry, the appeal could not be traced. Given the seriousness of the sentence (death penalty) and the timely filing of the present application, the court held that it was just and fair to grant the applicant another opportunity to appeal. The application was therefore allowed, and the applicant was granted leave to file a fresh petition of appeal within 14 days.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to file a Petition of Appeal within 14 days of the date of this ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
MISC. CRIM. APPLN NO. 131 OF 2018
JORAM THEURI GITHAIGA...........APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC.......................................RESPONDENT
(Intended Appeal from the conviction and sentence on the SRM’S Court at Meru In Crim. Case No. 1824 of 2014)
R U L I N G
1. Joram Theuri Githaiga (“the applicant”)was arraigned before the Meru Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court charged with the offence of robbery with violence contrary to section 296 (2) of the Penal Code.He denied the offence, was tried and convicted accordingly. He was subsequently sentenced to suffer death.
2. The applicant has now taken out a Motion on Notice under section 349 of the Criminal Procedure Codefor leave to appeal out of time. The Motion was supported by the applicant’s own affidavit sworn on 22nd November, 2018. The grounds are that after conviction and sentence, he duly filed an appeal against the said decision but due to some anomaly, his appeal cannot be located at the registry.
3. The application was not opposed by the Director of Public Prosecutions when it came up for hearing on 17th December, 2018.
4. I have considered the deposition of the applicant. The applicant faces the ultimate sentence, death. It is alleged that the decision sought to be appealed against was delivered on 9th October, 2018. The applicant has alleged that he lodged his appeal within time but due to an error, the same cannot be traced. He has sought leave to file a fresh one.
5. To my mind, the fact that there is an allegation that the applicant had earlier on complied with the law but for some error, coupled with the fact that the present Motion has been brought timeously, together with the extreme sentence metted out on him, it is only just and fair that the applicant be given another chance to test the decision he is aggrieved with.
6. Accordingly, I find the application to be meritorious and I allow the same. Let the Petition of Appeal be filed within 14 days of today’s date.
It is so ordered.
DATEDand DELIVERED at Meru this 21st day of February, 2019.
A. MABEYA
JUDGE