[2007] KEHC 1847 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioners misled the court by falsely stating they were the only heirs and by concealing the existence and priority of the objector, who was a son of the deceased. The petitioners, being grandchildren, did not have priority over the objector in applying for the grant. The court relied on...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KEHC 1847 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Joseph A. Omuyonga; Respondent: Atshon W. Omuyonga; Applicant: Petro Matukho Okachi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Succession Cause 53 of 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- Summons for revocation of grant allowed; grant and confirmation revoked; registration of land title in petitioner's name cancelled; title restored to deceased; costs to objector.
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant, Concealment of Material Facts, Priority of Beneficiaries, Fraudulent Obtainment of Grant
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph A. Omuyonga
Respondent
Atshon W. Omuyonga
Respondent
Petro Matukho Okachi
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration was obtained fraudulently by concealment of material facts.
- 2 Whether the objector, as a son of the deceased, had priority over the petitioners, who were grandchildren, in the administration of the estate.
- 3 Whether the requirements of section 76(b) and (c) of the Law of Succession Act for revocation of grant were met.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioners misled the court by falsely stating they were the only heirs and by concealing the existence and priority of the objector, who was a son of the deceased. The petitioners, being grandchildren, did not have priority over the objector in applying for the grant. The court relied on the admission by the second petitioner that the objector was excluded without his knowledge, and on the evidence that the grant was obtained by means of an untrue allegation of a fact essential in law. The requirements of section 76(b) and (c) of the Law of Succession Act were thus satisfied. Consequently, the grant and its confirmation were revoked, and the registration of the...
Court Disposition
Summons for revocation of grant allowed; grant and confirmation revoked; registration of land title in petitioner's name cancelled; title restored to deceased; costs to objector.
Orders
- The grant made on 2-5-2000 to Joseph A. Omuyonga and Atshon W. Omuyonga is revoked and annulled.
- The Certificate of Confirmation of the grant dated 11-3-2003 is revoked and annulled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA
Succession Cause 53 of 2000
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ELIZABETH A. OKACHI (DECEASED)
BETWEEN
1. JOSEPH A. OMUYONGA
2. ATSHON W. OMUYONGA……PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS
A N D
PETRO MATUKHO OKACHI…………..OBJECTOR/APPLICANT
RULING
In his Summons dated 15. 6.2006 for revocation of the Grant under section 76 of the Law of Succession Act, Cap 160, and Rule 44(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules, the Objector, Petro Matukho,sought orders that the Grant of Letters of Administration intestate made to Joseph Omunyonga and Atsoni W. Omuyonga not on 3rd May 2000 as stated but on 2-5-2000 and confirmed on 11-3-2003 be revoked on the grounds that the objector, as the son of the deceased, Elizabeth A. Okachi, ranks in priority to the Petitioners who are grandchildren to the deceased. The Objector averred that this fact was concealed from the court.
The affidavit of the Objector shows that Elizabeth A. Okachi, the deceased, had three sons, namely the Objector, Samson Omuyonga OkachiandAbudalla Eshiwani Okachi. It also shows that the Petitioners, Joseph A. Omuyongaand Atshoni N. Omuyongaare sons of the late Samson Omuyonga Okachi. The Objector alleged in his affidavit that they left his name out when they petitioned for Letters of Administration and that they did so secretly. The deceased died owing land parcel No. Butsotso/Bukura/433which constituted her estate. When the Grant was confirmed, the whole of the said land was passed to one Atshon W. Omuyonga alone who is neither a son nor a grandson of the deceased.
In paragraph 8 of his affidavit sworn on 5-8-2004, Dishon Wemali (Amuyonga), the 2nd Petitioner, conceded that the Petition herein was made without the knowledge of the Objector, whose name was not included in it.
On the basis of this admission, it is my finding that the requirements of section 76 (b) and (c) were met. When the Objection proceedings came up for hearing before me on 22-5-2007, the Objector testified and was cross examined. The petitioners who had been in court did not testify as they vanished and their counsel, Mr. Ondiek, was at a loss to explain their whereabouts.
In his evidence in court, the Objector testified that he was the 2nd born son of the deceased, while Samson Omuyonga was the 1st born. The 3rd born, he said, was Abdalla Eshiwani. Both the 1st and the 3rd born sons of the deceased are dead. He contended in his evidence that the land left by his mother, namely Butsotso/Bukura/433, should have been inherited by him and his two deceased brothers each taking 1/3 of the estate. He was surprised, he said, that the whole land went to one Atshon W. Omuyonga. He conceded that he had sold part of his share and that he needed to pass title to the buyer. But he had no capacity to sell nor could he pass good title. It was the Objector’s evidence that the Petitioners had lied to the court when they stated that they were sons of the deceased.
Mr. Ashioya, learned counsel for the objector, urged the court to revoke the Grant and the Confirmed Grant. Mr. Ondieki, learned counsel for the Petitioners, told the court that he had no evidence to offer.
I have perused the application and given due consideration to the evidence placed before the court. It is my finding that the Petitioners misled the court when they stated in the Petition that they were the only heirs. It is also my finding that the Petitioners obtained the Grant fraudulently by making that false statement and by concealing from the court that the objector was the deceased’s son while they were her grandchildren, facts that were material to the case. It is further my finding that the Grant was obtained by means of an untrue allegation of a fact essential in point of law to justify the grant.
In the premises, I have no hesitation in allowing the Summons which I hereby do. I revoke and annul the Grant made on 2-5-2000 to Joseph A. Muyongaand Atshon W. Omuyongaand the Certificate of Confirmation of the said Grant dated 11. 3.2003. I further order cancellation of the registration on 14. 3.2003 of Atshon W. Omuyonga as the proprietor of the land title No. Butsotso/Bukura/433 or of any other person claiming through him. I order restoration of the title to the said land into the name of the deceased, Elizabeth Akwabi Okach, who as at 15. 4.2003 was the registered proprietor. The Petitioners shall bear the costs of these objection proceedings. It is so ordered.
Dated at Kakamega this 8th day of November, 2007.
G. B. M. KARIUKI
J U D G E