[2021] KEELRC 1308 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 1308 (KLR)

The court found that while the respondent/applicant bears the burden to demonstrate an arguable appeal and the likelihood of suffering substantial loss if stay is not granted, there was no tangible evidence that the claimant would be unable to refund the decretal sum should the appeal succeed. However, considering...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 1308 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Joseph Ayora Omwena; Respondent: Multiscope Consulting Engineering Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 498 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
conditional stay of execution granted
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Security for Decretal Sum, Substantial Loss, Appeal Process, Judicial Discretion
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Security for Decretal Sum Substantial Loss Appeal Process Judicial Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Ayora Omwena

Claimant

Multiscope Consulting Engineering Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the respondent/applicant has demonstrated sufficient grounds for stay of execution of the judgment pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent/applicant will suffer substantial loss if stay is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent/applicant is willing and able to provide security for the due performance of the decree.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the respondent/applicant bears the burden to demonstrate an arguable appeal and the likelihood of suffering substantial loss if stay is not granted, there was no tangible evidence that the claimant would be unable to refund the decretal sum should the appeal succeed. However, considering the size of the sum, the economic context, and the need to balance the interests of both parties, the court exercised its discretion to grant a conditional stay of execution. The stay was made subject to the respondent paying 50% of the decretal amount to the claimant and depositing the remaining 50% in an interest-earning joint account held by the advocates for both parties...

Court Disposition

conditional stay of execution granted

Orders

  • An order for stay of execution of the judgment delivered on 26th January, 2021 and decree thereof is granted on condition that the respondent/applicant pays 50% of the decretal amount within 30 days of this ruling.
  • 50% of the decretal sum to be placed in an interest earning joint account in the names of the advocates for the claimant and the respondent within 30 days of this ruling.