[2022] KEELC 1142 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 1142 (KLR)

The court found that the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) is a proper party to the proceedings. The Environmental Management and Coordination Act (EMCA) vests NEMA with broad supervisory and coordination powers over environmental matters, including those arising from land use and infrastructure...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 1142 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joseph Chuma Nyambera; Respondent: County Government of Nyamira; Respondent: Chairman of Land Commission; Respondent: Honourable Attorney General; Respondent: National Environment Management Authority
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? E001 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Strike Out 4th Respondent
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
CM Kamau
Legal Topics
Compulsory Acquisition, Environmental Impact Assessment, Joinder and Misjoinder of Parties, Right to Clean and Healthy Environment, County Government Functions, Remedies for Environmental Harm
Source Language
en
Land and Property Environmental Law Civil Procedure Compulsory Acquisition Environmental Impact Assessment Joinder and Misjoinder of Parties Right to Clean and Healthy Environment County Government Functions +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Chuma Nyambera

Applicant

County Government of Nyamira

Respondent

Chairman of Land Commission

Respondent

Honourable Attorney General

Respondent

National Environment Management Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Strike Out 4th Respondent

  1. 1 Whether the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) is a proper party to the petition and should be struck out from the proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether the functions of NEMA and the County Environment Committees are relevant to the dispute concerning compulsory acquisition and environmental harm.
  3. 3 Whether the petition discloses a cause of action against NEMA under the Environmental Management and Coordination Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) is a proper party to the proceedings. The Environmental Management and Coordination Act (EMCA) vests NEMA with broad supervisory and coordination powers over environmental matters, including those arising from land use and infrastructure projects such as road construction. The Second Schedule to the EMCA specifically contemplates that road construction projects require environmental impact assessment, a process within NEMA's statutory mandate. Furthermore, Section 3 of the EMCA and Article 42 of the Constitution guarantee the right to a clean and healthy environment, and NEMA is the principal government agency...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application to strike out the 4th Respondent (NEMA) is disallowed.
  • The Respondents to file their responses within 14 days from the date of this ruling.