[2001] KECA 168 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal held that the single Judge properly exercised his discretion in refusing to grant an extension of time to file and serve the notice and record of appeal. The applicant's delay in lodging the appeal, nearly four years, was inordinate and not satisfactorily explained. The letter requesting...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] KECA 168 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Joseph Kariuki Njoroge; Respondent: Stephen Rurigi Njoroge
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 67 of 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Reference Against Refusal of Extension of Time by Single Judge
- Outcome
- reference dismissed with costs
- Judges
- AB Shah
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Exercise of Discretion, Appeals Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Kariuki Njoroge
Applicant
Stephen Rurigi Njoroge
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Reference Against Refusal of Extension of Time by Single Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the single Judge properly exercised discretion in refusing to grant extension of time to file and serve notice and record of appeal.
- 2 Whether the delay in lodging the appeal was sufficiently explained to warrant extension of time.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the single Judge properly exercised his discretion in refusing to grant an extension of time to file and serve the notice and record of appeal. The applicant's delay in lodging the appeal, nearly four years, was inordinate and not satisfactorily explained. The letter requesting proceedings was sent six months late and not copied to the respondent, rendering it ineffective. Furthermore, the applicant failed to obtain a certificate of delay to substantiate the claim that the delay was attributable to the court registry. The court found no error, misdirection, or lack of consideration by the single Judge and dismissed the reference with costs.
Court Disposition
reference dismissed with costs
Orders
- The reference is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: GICHERU, SHAH & LAKHA, JJ.A CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 67 OF 2000
BETWEEN
JOSEPH KARIUKI NJOROGE..................................APPLICANT
AND
STEPHEN RURIGI NJOROGE ..............................RESPONDENT
(Reference against refusal by a single Judge (Omolo, JA) in an application for extension of time to file notice and Record of appeal in an intended appeal from the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Sheikh Amin, J) dated 22. 9.96
in
H.C.C.C. NO. 129 OF 1995) ****************
RULING OF THE COURT
This is a reference to full bench whereby the applicant seeks reversal of the ruling of the learned single Judge (Omolo, JA) whereby he declined to grant an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal and record of appeal. We bear in mind the fact that we are dealing with the exercise of discretion by the learned single Judge. In the exercise of his discretion he took into account the fact that the letter bespeaking copies of proceedings was not sent to the registry of the superior court until 17th April, 1997 some six months out of time. A copy of that letter was not even sent to the respondent. The learned Judge correctly pointed out that for all practical purposes the letter of 17th April, 1997 was of no assistance.
The learned single Judge also properly considered the issue of lack of certificate of delay which would have shown, if at all, the alleged delay attributed to the registry of the superior court.
The learned single Judge was properly of the view that the delay in lodgment of the appeal for nearly 4 years was so inordinate as not to permit him to exercise his discretion in granting the application in question.
We see no error, misdirection or lack of consideration of issues raised by the applicant, on part of the learned single Judge. Accordingly this reference is dismissed with costs.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 13th day of March, 2001.
J.E. GICHERU ............................ JUDGE OF APPEAL
A.B. SHAH ...................... JUDGE OF APPEAL
A.A. LAKHA ........................ JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR.