[2000] KEHC 163 (KLR)

[2000] KEHC 163 (KLR)

The court accepted the plaintiff's evidence that the deceased was employed as a driver earning Ksh.500 per day, despite the lack of documentary proof, and found it reasonable to adopt a multiplicand of Ksh.5,000 per month and a multiplier of 15 years, given the deceased's age and circumstances. The court awarded...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] KEHC 163 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Joseph Kimani Mugaya; Defendant: John Kibagio Njiru; Defendant: Catherine Musimbi Gidali
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 3690 of 1994
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff
Judges
JK Mulwa
Legal Topics
Fatal Accidents, Loss of Dependency, Assessment of Damages, Pain and Suffering
Source Language
en
Tort Law Fatal Accidents Loss of Dependency Assessment of Damages Pain and Suffering

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Kimani Mugaya

Plaintiff

John Kibagio Njiru

Defendant

Catherine Musimbi Gidali

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 What is the appropriate quantum of general damages for loss of dependency following the deceased's death in a road accident.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff has proved the deceased's employment and earnings for purposes of calculating damages.
  3. 3 What amount should be awarded for pain and suffering and special damages.

Ratio Decidendi

The court accepted the plaintiff's evidence that the deceased was employed as a driver earning Ksh.500 per day, despite the lack of documentary proof, and found it reasonable to adopt a multiplicand of Ksh.5,000 per month and a multiplier of 15 years, given the deceased's age and circumstances. The court awarded general damages for loss of dependency based on this calculation, as well as special damages as pleaded and proved, and a conventional sum for pain and suffering since the deceased died on the same day of the accident. The court found that the plaintiff had established his claim on a balance of probabilities and was entitled to judgment as prayed.

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • General damages for loss of dependency awarded at Ksh.900,000.
  • Special damages awarded at Ksh.34,873.