[2018] KEHC 493 (KLR)
The court found that the succeeding magistrate failed to comply with section 200(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code by not informing the appellant of his right to have witnesses recalled and reheard. This procedural irregularity rendered the conviction and sentence unsafe and necessitated their quashing. Considering...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 493 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Joseph Kipkoech Cheruiyot; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 40 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence quashed; retrial ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Defilement, Sexual Offences Act, Section 200 Cpc, Retrial Principles, Procedural Irregularity
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Kipkoech Cheruiyot
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial magistrate complied with section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code upon taking over the case.
- 2 Whether the failure to comply with section 200 CPC vitiated the conviction and sentence.
- 3 Whether the appropriate remedy is an acquittal or an order for retrial.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the succeeding magistrate failed to comply with section 200(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code by not informing the appellant of his right to have witnesses recalled and reheard. This procedural irregularity rendered the conviction and sentence unsafe and necessitated their quashing. Considering the case was not old and in the interests of justice, the court determined that a retrial was appropriate rather than an acquittal.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence quashed; retrial ordered.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The conviction and sentence are quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KISII
HIGH COURT CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 40 OF 2016
JOSEPH KIPKOECH CHERUIYOT..............................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC......................................................................RESPONDENT
(Being an appeal against the conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No 457 of 2016
at Kilgoris Law Courts before Hon. A.K. Mokoross SRM on 22. 11. 2016)
JUDGMENT
1. The appellant’s was charged with 2 offences, defilement contrary to section 8 (1) (2) of the Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006 and committing an indecent act with a child contrary to section 11 (1) of the Sexual Offences Act no. 3 of 2006. The appellant pleaded not guilty and the trial commenced before Hon. Munyendo Sitati RM. Hon. Munyendo heard 3 key witnesses the complainant, her mother and the arresting officer. Hon. Munyendo was transferred and Hon. Mokoross took over the matter on the 25/10/2016. Hon Mokoross did not comply with the provisions of section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code(CPC)Cap. 75 of the Laws of Kenya. Section 200 (3) specifically provides that, where a succeeding magistrate commences the hearing of proceedings and part of the evidence has been recorded by his predecessor, the accused person may demand that any witness be resummoned and reheard and the succeeding magistrate shall inform the accused person of that right.
2. Since the succeeding trial magistrate did not comply with the provisions section 200 of the CPC I am constrained to allow the appeal and quash the conviction and sentence.
3. The next question is whether in the circumstances of the case, there should be an acquittal or a retrial be ordered. The guiding principle is that each case must depend on particular facts and circumstances of that case but an order for retrial should be made where the interest of justice require it and should not be ordered where it is likely to cause an injustice to the appellant. (See Makupe vs. Republic [1984 KLR 523).The case is a 2016 case and is therefore not an old case. I have considered the matter and in the interest of justice I order a retrial. The appellant shall remain in custody and shall be taken to Kilgoris Principal Magistrate’s Court to take plea on the 13th of December 2018.
Dated signed and delivered at Kisii on the 7th December 2018.
R.E.OUGO
JUDGE
In the presence of;
Mr. Otieno, Senior Prosecution Counsel for the State
Appellant In person
Rael Court clerk