[2019] KEELRC 1824 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 1824 (KLR)

The court found that the Respondent improperly dealt with the auctioneer to the exclusion of the Claimant's counsel and made payments to the auctioneer rather than directly to the Claimant. The auctioneer, in turn, deducted an excessive amount as charges and forwarded only a small portion to the Claimant. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 1824 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Joseph Korir; Respondent: Race Guards Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 246 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Execution Application / Ruling on Application for Release of Attached Motor Vehicle and Payment of Decretal Sum
Outcome
application allowed in part
Judges
AN Makau
Legal Topics
Execution of Decree, Auctioneer Charges, Payment of Decretal Sum
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Execution of Decree Auctioneer Charges Payment of Decretal Sum

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Korir

Claimant

Race Guards Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Execution Application / Ruling on Application for Release of Attached Motor Vehicle and Payment of Decretal Sum

  1. 1 Whether the auctioneer was entitled to deduct charges from the decretal sum due to the Claimant.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent satisfied the decree by paying the auctioneer instead of the Claimant.
  3. 3 Whether the Claimant is entitled to the balance of the decretal sum and reasonable auctioneer charges.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Respondent improperly dealt with the auctioneer to the exclusion of the Claimant's counsel and made payments to the auctioneer rather than directly to the Claimant. The auctioneer, in turn, deducted an excessive amount as charges and forwarded only a small portion to the Claimant. The court held that the Claimant was entitled to the full decretal sum without unauthorized deductions, and that the auctioneer was not entitled to extract sums beyond what could be awarded on taxation. The Respondent was therefore ordered to pay the balance of the decretal sum to the Claimant and to pay reasonable auctioneer's charges within 14 days, failing which the Claimant would be...

Court Disposition

application allowed in part

Orders

  • The Respondent shall pay the balance of costs due to the Claimant within 14 days.
  • The Respondent shall pay reasonable auctioneer's charges within 14 days.