[2018] KEELRC 1669 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 1669 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was employed under two separate contracts, the latter running from June 2016 to June 2017 at a monthly salary of Kshs. 15,000. The claimant was terminated without notice, entitling him to one month’s pay in lieu of notice. However, the claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 1669 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Joseph Makeri Wanjiru; Respondent: Shem Kambo t/a Pals Restaurant Enterprises Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1908 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant in part.
Judges
B Ongaya
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Notice Pay, Annual Leave Entitlement, Public Holiday Pay, Salary Arrears, Overtime Claims
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Notice Pay Annual Leave Entitlement Public Holiday Pay Salary Arrears Overtime Claims

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Makeri Wanjiru

Claimant

Shem Kambo t/a Pals Restaurant Enterprises Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly terminated from employment without notice.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to payment in lieu of notice, annual leave, salary arrears, overtime, and public holiday pay.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant has established claims for overtime and salary arrears.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was employed under two separate contracts, the latter running from June 2016 to June 2017 at a monthly salary of Kshs. 15,000. The claimant was terminated without notice, entitling him to one month’s pay in lieu of notice. However, the claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence regarding the circumstances of termination to establish unfair dismissal, and thus was not awarded compensation for unfair termination. The court held that the agreed salary covered all hours worked, including overtime, and there was no evidence of a grievance or agreement for additional overtime pay or salary arrears. The claims for overtime and salary arrears were therefore...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant in part.

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs. 61,000 by 01.08.2018, failing which interest shall accrue at court rates from the date of judgment until full payment.
  • The respondent shall pay the costs of the suit.