[2020] KEHC 6419 (KLR)
The trial court erred in ordering that the default sentences for non-payment of fines run concurrently, contrary to Section 37 of the Penal Code, which requires such sentences to run consecutively. Additionally, the default sentence of one year for a fine of Kshs.50,000 exceeded the statutory maximum of six months...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 6419 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Joseph Mbugua Mukami; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nanyuki
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 93 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Order on Revision
- Outcome
- Conviction upheld; custodial and default sentences for Count (i) set aside and substituted with time served; applicant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held; driving disqualification order maintained.
- Legal Topics
- Traffic Offences, Sentencing Principles, Revision Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Mbugua Mukami
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Order on Revision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the default sentences imposed by the trial court were lawful and should run concurrently or consecutively.
- 2 Whether the imposition of both a fine and a term of imprisonment for Count (i) was justified.
- 3 Whether the court should interfere with the order disqualifying the convict from driving.
Ratio Decidendi
The trial court erred in ordering that the default sentences for non-payment of fines run concurrently, contrary to Section 37 of the Penal Code, which requires such sentences to run consecutively. Additionally, the default sentence of one year for a fine of Kshs.50,000 exceeded the statutory maximum of six months under Section 28(2) of the Penal Code. The trial court also failed to justify the imposition of both a fine and a custodial sentence for Count (i), despite the convict's remorseful conduct. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the need to decongest prisons, the High Court exercised its revisionary jurisdiction to set aside the custodial sentence and default sentence for Count...
Court Disposition
Conviction upheld; custodial and default sentences for Count (i) set aside and substituted with time served; applicant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held; driving disqualification order maintained.
Orders
- The term of imprisonment of one year in Count (i) and the default sentence of one year in the same count are set aside and substituted with time already served.
- The default sentences in Counts (ii) and (iii) are confirmed as already served.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NANYUKI
CRIMINAL REVISION NO.93 OF 2020
JOSEPH MBUGUA MUKAMI......................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC..................................................................RESPONDENT
(Revision of the Original Sentence dated 29. 10. 2019
in Nanyuki Traffic Case No.92 of 2019– N. Thuku, PM)
04. 05. 2020
Before Justice H P G Waweru
In Chambers
ORDER ON REVISION
1. I have examined the record of the trial court.
2. The convict herein, JOSEPH MBUGUA MUKAMI, was convicted after trial of three traffic offences and sentenced on 29/10/2019 as follows:-
Count (i):-Causing death by dangerous driving contrary to Section 46 of the Traffic Act, Cap 403 – Sentenced to a fine of Kshs.50,000= and in default to serve one (1) year imprisonment. In addition he was sentenced to one (1) year imprisonment and also disqualified from driving for three (3) years from the date he completes imprisonment.
Count (ii):- Failing to maintain motor vehicle parts and equipment contrary to Section 55(1) and 58(1) of the Traffic Act. – Sentenced to a fine of Kshs.5,000= and in default to serve three (3) months imprisonment.
Count (iii):- Driving a motor vehicle on a public road without an inspection sticker contrary to Section 17A(3)(a) and 29(1) of the Traffic Act. – Sentenced to a fine of Kshs.2,000= and in default to serve one (1) month imprisonment.
The Default sentences were ordered to run concurrently. He did not pay any of the fines
3. The order for the default sentences to run concurrently was illegal in view of the provisonto Section 37of thePenal Codewhich reads -
“Provided that it shall not be lawful for a court to direct that a sentence of imprisonment in default of payment of a fine shall be executed concurrently with a former sentence under sub-paragraph (i) of paragraph (c) of subsection (i) of Section 28 or of any part thereof.”
In other words, sentences in default of payment of fines must run consecutively!
4. It is also to be noted that for a fine not exceeding Kshs.50,000= thedefault sentence should not be more than 6 months. See Section 28(2) ofthe Penal Code.
5. As regards Count (i), the trial court did not explain why it wasnecessary to impose both a fine and a term of imprisonment, even after noting that the conduct of the convict throughout the trial showed he was remorseful.
6. Because of the current Coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis in our country,and in order to decongest the prisons, and in exercise of the powers ofcourt underArticle 159(2)of theConstitutionandSections 362and364of theCriminal Procedure Code, I will set aside the term of imprisonment of one (1) year in Count (i) and also the default sentence of one (1) year in the same count, and substitute therefore the time already served. The default sentences in Counts (ii) and (iii) have already been served. That means that the convict shall be set at liberty forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held. It is so ordered.
As for the order disqualifying the convict from driving for a period of three (3) years, I decline to interfere with the same. It is so ordered.
DATED AT NANYUKI THIS 4TH DAY OF MAY, 2020
H.P.G. WAWERU
JUDGE.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
NANYUKI HIGH COURT