[2008] KEHC 94 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 94 (KLR)

The court found that the affidavit of service did not establish that the alleged contemnors were personally served with the relevant court orders. Instead, the orders were left with registry staff, which does not satisfy the legal requirement for personal service in contempt proceedings. As personal service is a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] KEHC 94 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joseph Mburu Gitau & 626 Others; Respondent: The Commissioner of Police; Respondent: The Commissioner of Lands; Respondent: The Honourable Attorney General
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 673 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Commence Contempt Proceedings
Outcome
application struck out
Judges
JW Nyamu
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Service of Process, Personal Service Requirement
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Service of Process Personal Service Requirement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Mburu Gitau & 626 Others

Applicant

The Commissioner of Police

Respondent

The Commissioner of Lands

Respondent

The Honourable Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Commence Contempt Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether personal service of the court orders on the alleged contemnors was effected as required for contempt proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether the application for leave to commence contempt proceedings can stand in the absence of personal service.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the affidavit of service did not establish that the alleged contemnors were personally served with the relevant court orders. Instead, the orders were left with registry staff, which does not satisfy the legal requirement for personal service in contempt proceedings. As personal service is a strict prerequisite for commencing contempt proceedings, the failure to effect such service is fatal to the application. Consequently, the application for leave to commence contempt proceedings was struck out, with costs to abide the outcome of the main application.

Court Disposition

application struck out

Orders

  • The application dated 4th July 2008 is struck out.
  • Costs to abide the outcome of the main application when determined.