[2019] KEELC 875 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 875 (KLR)

The court found that although the applicant did not demonstrate that he had requested for the lower court proceedings and judgment, the preparation of the memorandum of appeal indicated a genuine intention to appeal. The court considered it fair and just to allow the applicant an opportunity to seek redress through...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 875 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joseph M’Mugambi; Respondent: Isaiah Mbaabu; Respondent: Samson Miriti Mbaabu
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case 17 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
Outcome
application allowed with conditions
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Memorandum of Appeal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Appeals Process Memorandum of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph M’Mugambi

Applicant

Isaiah Mbaabu

Respondent

Samson Miriti Mbaabu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient cause for extension of time to file a memorandum of appeal.
  2. 2 Whether failure to obtain proceedings and judgment in time constitutes a valid reason for delay.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although the applicant did not demonstrate that he had requested for the lower court proceedings and judgment, the preparation of the memorandum of appeal indicated a genuine intention to appeal. The court considered it fair and just to allow the applicant an opportunity to seek redress through the appellate process, emphasizing the importance of access to justice. However, the court also noted the applicant's failure to strictly comply with procedural requirements and therefore imposed costs against him. The extension of time was granted on the condition that the memorandum of appeal be filed and served within 14 days, failing which the leave would lapse.

Court Disposition

application allowed with conditions

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to file and serve the memorandum of appeal within 14 days from the date of the ruling.
  • Failure to file and serve within 14 days will result in the lapse of the leave granted.