[2018] KEELRC 1168 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 1168 (KLR)

The Respondent/Applicant failed to comply with the court's explicit order to file an appeal within sixty days from the date of the ruling delivered on 2nd November, 2017. The application to set aside or vary the consequences of that order was filed more than eight months after the ruling, constituting an...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 1168 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Joseph Morara Omoke; Respondent: Invesco Assurance Company Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 245 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Cause / Ruling on Application
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Appeal Timelines, Release of Decretal Sum, Doctrine of Laches
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Appeal Timelines Release of Decretal Sum Doctrine of Laches

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Morara Omoke

Claimant

Invesco Assurance Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Cause / Ruling on Application

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent/Applicant complied with the court's order to file an appeal within sixty days.
  2. 2 Whether the application dated 7th June 2018 is merited given the lapse of time since the original ruling.
  3. 3 Whether the doctrine of laches applies to bar the Respondent/Applicant's application.

Ratio Decidendi

The Respondent/Applicant failed to comply with the court's explicit order to file an appeal within sixty days from the date of the ruling delivered on 2nd November, 2017. The application to set aside or vary the consequences of that order was filed more than eight months after the ruling, constituting an unreasonable and unexplained delay. The court found that the Respondent/Applicant was caught by the doctrine of laches, having slept on its right to appeal. Accordingly, the application lacked merit and was dismissed with costs to the Claimant/Respondent.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application dated 7th June 2018 is dismissed with costs to the Claimant/Respondent.