[2019] KEELC 316 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 316 (KLR)

The court found that the application sought to enforce a decree from Kitale SPMCC Land Case No. 12 of 2000, but was improperly filed in the present suit (Kitale ELC No. 19 of 2013), which had already been dismissed with costs on 20/2/2014. The decree being enforced was not part of the consolidated suits in this...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 316 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Joseph Muchoe Wanyama (Suing for and on behalf of Members of Yuya Farmers Co-operative Society Ltd); Defendant: Mercia Muliro (Suing as personal representative of Masinde Muliro, Deceased)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Land Case 19 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Eviction Order Post Judgment
Outcome
application struck out as incompetent
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Eviction Orders, Execution of Decrees, Limitation of Actions, Dismissal of Suit
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Eviction Orders Execution of Decrees Limitation of Actions Dismissal of Suit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Muchoe Wanyama (Suing for and on behalf of Members of Yuya Farmers Co-operative Society Ltd)

Plaintiff

Mercia Muliro (Suing as personal representative of Masinde Muliro, Deceased)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Eviction Order Post Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the court should issue an eviction order authorizing the OCPD Kachibora Police Station to evict persons from LR 11209 Sibanga Farm as per the decree in SPMCC Land Case No. 12 of 2000.
  2. 2 Whether the application for execution of the decree is properly before this court or should have been filed in the original suit file.
  3. 3 Whether the application is statute barred or otherwise incompetent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application sought to enforce a decree from Kitale SPMCC Land Case No. 12 of 2000, but was improperly filed in the present suit (Kitale ELC No. 19 of 2013), which had already been dismissed with costs on 20/2/2014. The decree being enforced was not part of the consolidated suits in this file, and the only executable decree in this file was the one dismissing the plaintiff's claim. The court held that there was no legal basis for seeking execution of a foreign decree in this file, and the application was therefore incompetent. The court further noted that no sufficient grounds were advanced for bringing the application before this court, and the prayers sought were...

Court Disposition

application struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • The application dated 25/7/2019 is struck out.
  • No orders as to costs.