[2007] KEHC 540 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants, purporting to act as trustees of Bethel Church INC, failed to prove that the church was a registered society under the Societies Act. As such, Bethel Church INC was deemed an unlawful society, and the applicants lacked locus standi to institute the proceedings on its behalf. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KEHC 540 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Joseph Muiru & Two Others; Defendant: Jane Njeri Kimani
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 602 of 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons / Judgment
- Outcome
- originating summons dismissed with costs to the respondent
- Judges
- KH Rawal
- Legal Topics
- Locus Standi, Adverse Possession, Registration of Societies, Trusteeship
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Muiru & Two Others
Plaintiff
Jane Njeri Kimani
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants, as trustees of Bethel Church INC, have locus standi to file the suit.
- 2 Whether Bethel Church INC is a registered society under the Societies Act.
- 3 Whether the applicants can claim ownership of L.R. No. Limuru/Bibirioni/T.512 by adverse possession on behalf of Bethel Church INC.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants, purporting to act as trustees of Bethel Church INC, failed to prove that the church was a registered society under the Societies Act. As such, Bethel Church INC was deemed an unlawful society, and the applicants lacked locus standi to institute the proceedings on its behalf. The court held that the burden of proof regarding registration was on the applicants, and their failure to discharge this burden was fatal to their case. Consequently, the court dismissed the originating summons without considering the merits of the adverse possession claim.
Court Disposition
originating summons dismissed with costs to the respondent
Orders
- The Originating Summons is dismissed.
- Costs awarded to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Civil Case 602 of 2003
JOSEPH MUIRU & TWO OTHERS…………....……….PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
JANE NJERI KIMANI………….………………………DEFENDANT
J U D G M E N T
This Originating Summons is brought by three persons suing on behalf of themselves and as registered Trustees of Bethel church INC.
In the Originating Summons they claim to be (on behalf of Bethel Church Inc) the absolute owner of L.R. No. Limuru/Bibirioni/T.512 by virtue of adverse possession and seek orders inter alia:
1. That the Bethel Church INC which has been in adverse possession of L.R. No. Limuru/Bibirioni/T 512 from 1975 to date be declared the owner thereof and be registered as the absolute proprietor thereof”.
In the further replying affidavit sworn on 4th June, 2007 by the Respondent it is averred that Bethel Church INC is not a society registered under the Societies Act, (Cap 108). On page 31 of the said affidavit a certificate of registration No. 10977 is issued in the name of Bethel Church as at 7th November 1981. This originating summon was filed on 17th June, 2003. Still the names of an unregistered Society is placed on an Applicant and that shall make the Applicant Society an unlawful Society as per provisions of section 4(1) of the Societies Act.
In the replying affidavit there is averment that Bethel Church INC is not a registered Society and contrary to what was contended by Mr. Mwara, the burden to prove that it is a registered Society is on the Applicant. I have only to refer to section 45(b) of the Societies Act which stipulates
“45 (b) where it is alleged that a Society is an unlawful society. The burden to proving that it is a registered Society or an exempted society or that it is not a Society, shall lie on the person charged.” (emphasis mine)
Thus the Applicants, who have filed this originating summons as trustees of an unlawful Society, not only that they do not have locus standi, but are also contravening the provisions of the Societies Act.
I thus find that the Applicants have no locus Standi to file the Originating Summons on behalf of an unlawful Society.
With the above finding, I need not go into merits of the case and the issues raised.
I dismiss the Originating Summons with costs to the Respondent.
Dated, Delivered and Signed at Nairobi this 29th day of November, 2007.
K.H. RAWAL
JUDGE