[2021] KEHC 1114 (KLR)
The court held that the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu and the subsequent guidelines restrict the application of resentencing to murder cases under Sections 203 and 204 of the Penal Code. Since the petitioner was convicted of robbery with violence under Section 296(2) of the Penal Code, the court has no...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 1114 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Joseph Muthee Kago; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Petition 12 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Judges
- JK Mulwa, RM Mwongo
- Legal Topics
- Robbery With Violence, Sentencing Guidelines, Resentencing, Application of Supreme Court Decisions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Muthee Kago
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Supreme Court decision in Muruatetu applies to re-sentencing for the offence of robbery with violence.
- 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to a reduction of sentence or resentencing based on time spent in custody.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu and the subsequent guidelines restrict the application of resentencing to murder cases under Sections 203 and 204 of the Penal Code. Since the petitioner was convicted of robbery with violence under Section 296(2) of the Penal Code, the court has no jurisdiction to entertain a resentencing hearing or reduce the sentence based on the Muruatetu decision. Consequently, the petition for resentencing and reduction of sentence is dismissed as it is not supported by the current legal framework.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- The petition for resentencing and reduction of sentence is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT
AT KERUGOYA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12 OF 2019
(From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No. 47 of 2013 of the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Kerugoya
JOSEPH MUTHEE KAGO.....PETITIONER
VERSUS
REPUBLIC...............................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. The Petitioner, Joseph Muthee Kago was charged, tried, convicted and sentenced to suffer death for the offence of Robbery with violence, contrary to Section 296(2) of the Penal Code in Kerugoya CMCC No. 47 of 2013. The sentence was meted to the Petitioner on the 2nd December, 2014, having been arrested on the 24th January, 2013. He therefore spent a period of two years in custody before the sentence.
2. His appeal to this court vide Kerugoya Criminal Case No. 47/2013 was dismissed. He then proceeded to file a further appeal to the Court of Appeal, being No. 121 of 2019 which he withdrew.
3. Upon the above, the Petitioner filed the petition dated 5th September, 2019 whereupon he sought one prayer only, reduction of sentence on the strength of the “Muruatetu” decision. He did not petition for consideration of the period spent in custody before the sentence.
The death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment by the President, which the Petitioner is now serving
4. By a Petition dated 27th June, 2019, the Petitioner sought an order for resentencing pursuant to the “Muruatetu” Supreme Court Decision – Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Others vs Republic [2017] eKLR, and consideration of the period he spent in custody before and during the hearing of the case, up to the date of sentence, being two years.
5. The Petitioner filed very spirited mitigation and urged for reduction of the sentence. The Prosecution Counsel, Mr. Ashimosi filed written submissions on the 15th May, 2020 and urged that since the Petitioner had served 7 years in prison, a reduction to 15 years minus years spent in custody would be fair but upon the Court’s discretion.
6. The Petitioner would have benefitted from “Muruatetu” decision (Supra) on re-sentence hearing as well as consideration of the period he spent in custody pursuant to the “Muruatetu” decision.
7. I have considered the mitigating factors and the submissions as a whole. Reduction and or sentence re-hearing would have been possible before the 6th July, 2021, when the Supreme Court revisited its earlier decision on the Muruatetu case rendered on the 14th December, 2017.
8. The court gave policy guidelines and directions on the applicability of the said decision thus; the decision on Muruatetu and the guidelines apply ONLY in respect of sentences of murder under Sections 203 and 204 of the Penal Code, and not in any other offence.
9. By the above, it is very clear that no re-sentencing hearing should be entertained by any court, and this includes sentence for the offence of robbery with violence for which the Petitioner was charged, convicted and sentenced for.
10. For the foregoing, the petition cannot be entertained. It is dismissed.
Dated and Signed this…………..….……day of………....…….2021
J. N. MULWA
JUDGE
DATED AND DELIVERED AT KERUGOYA THIS 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
R. M. MWONGO
JUDGE