[2022] KEELC 851 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 851 (KLR)

The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to determine the application for review, the consent letter, and the notice of withdrawal of advocates because the core issue—who are the bona fide officials of the defendant cooperative society—falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Cooperative Tribunal under...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 851 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Joseph Mutua Mbuva; Defendant: Waichakehiri Farmers Society Ltd (sued through Chairman Robert Kimathi Marete)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 175 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Ruling on Application to Review And/or Set Aside Dismissal Orders
Outcome
Application struck out for want of jurisdiction; related documents expunged from the record.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Tribunal, Legal Representative Authority, Consent Orders, Withdrawal of Advocates
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of Tribunal Legal Representative Authority Consent Orders Withdrawal of Advocates

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Mutua Mbuva

Plaintiff

Waichakehiri Farmers Society Ltd (sued through Chairman Robert Kimathi Marete)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Ruling on Application to Review And/or Set Aside Dismissal Orders

  1. 1 Does the Environment and Land Court have jurisdiction to determine disputes regarding the bona fides of officials of a cooperative society?
  2. 2 Can the court entertain applications or consent letters affecting the decree before the bona fide officials are determined by the Cooperative Tribunal?
  3. 3 Who has the authority to instruct or withdraw legal representation for the defendant society?

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to determine the application for review, the consent letter, and the notice of withdrawal of advocates because the core issue—who are the bona fide officials of the defendant cooperative society—falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Cooperative Tribunal under Section 76 of the Cooperative Societies Act. Until the tribunal determines the legitimate officials, the court cannot entertain applications or orders affecting the decree or legal representation. Consequently, all impugned applications and documents were struck out and expunged from the record.

Court Disposition

Application struck out for want of jurisdiction; related documents expunged from the record.

Orders

  • The application dated 15.11.2021 is struck out.
  • The consent letter filed on 23.2.2021 is struck out and expunged from the record.