[2021] KEELRC 602 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 602 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was employed by the respondent as a driver, earning Kshs 300 per day, which was below the statutory minimum wage of Kshs 744.10 as per Legal Notice No. 117 of 2015. The respondent failed to issue a written contract as required by law and did not provide any evidence to controvert...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 602 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Joseph Mwangi Irungu; Respondent: Afric Eco Solutions Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 274 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Claim / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant; claim allowed as prayed with quantified awards.
Judges
HS Wasilwa
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Underpayment of Wages, Overtime Claims, Leave Entitlement, Compensation for Dismissal
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Underpayment of Wages Overtime Claims Leave Entitlement Compensation for Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Mwangi Irungu

Claimant

Afric Eco Solutions Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly terminated from employment without notice or valid reason.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was underpaid contrary to statutory minimum wage requirements.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for unpaid leave, overtime, and other benefits.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was employed by the respondent as a driver, earning Kshs 300 per day, which was below the statutory minimum wage of Kshs 744.10 as per Legal Notice No. 117 of 2015. The respondent failed to issue a written contract as required by law and did not provide any evidence to controvert the claimant's assertions. The termination was effected without notice, valid reason, or a hearing, contrary to the mandatory provisions of the Employment Act. The court held that the claimant was unfairly terminated and entitled to compensation for underpayment, unpaid leave, salary in lieu of notice, and damages for unfair dismissal. The total award was Kshs 125,083 less...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant; claim allowed as prayed with quantified awards.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant Kshs 27,978.30 for underpayment of wages.
  • Respondent to pay claimant Kshs 7,813.05 for unpaid leave.