[2007] KECA 510 (KLR)
The Court found that the applicant, having been convicted of a capital offence and sentenced to death, should be afforded the opportunity to appeal. The delay was explained as being due to lack of proper legal counsel, and the Republic did not oppose the application. Furthermore, the applicant's co-accused had...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KECA 510 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Joseph Mwangi Murigi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 8 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application allowed; extension of time granted.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Summary Rejection of Appeal, Robbery With Violence, Capital Offence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Mwangi Murigi
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether the notice of appeal already filed should be deemed as properly filed within time.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the applicant, having been convicted of a capital offence and sentenced to death, should be afforded the opportunity to appeal. The delay was explained as being due to lack of proper legal counsel, and the Republic did not oppose the application. Furthermore, the applicant's co-accused had previously been granted an extension of time to appeal in similar circumstances. In the interests of justice and to ensure parity of treatment, the Court exercised its discretion to extend the time for lodging the notice of appeal and deemed the notice already filed as properly filed within time.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; extension of time granted.
Orders
- Time for lodging the Notice of Appeal is extended.
- The Notice of Appeal lodged on 17th February, 2006 is deemed as filed within time.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
Crim Appli 8 of 2006
JOSEPH MWANGI MURIGI ……………………………………. APPLICANT
AND
REPUBLIC …………………………………………………..…. RESPONDENT
(Application for extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal out of time from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Mr. Justice Musinga) dated 21st October, 2005
in
H.C.CR.A. NO. 380 OF 2003)
********************
R U L I N G
The applicant seeks two orders under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules viz; that time within which to lodge an appeal be extended and that the notice of appeal already filed be deemed to be timeously filed. The application is supported by the affidavit of Githui John, learned counsel for the applicant.
The applicant intends to file an appeal against the order of the superior court (Musinga, J.) dated 21st October 2005 summarily rejecting the applicant’s Criminal Appeal No.380 of 2003 under section 352(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
The rejected appeal was against conviction and sentence in Nakuru Chief Magistrate’s Criminal Case No. 2351 of 2001 whereby the applicant was convicted for the offence of robbery with violence contrary to section 296(2) Penal Code and sentenced to death on 30th July 2003. It appears that the appeal by applicant’s co-accused ISAAC MWANGI WANJIKU was similarly summarily rejected by the superior court. The applicant’s co-accused filed Criminal Application No. Nai.2 of 2005 in the Court for the extension of time for lodging the Notice of Appeal which application was allowed by this Court (Omolo, J.A.) on 26th September, 2005.
The present application was filed on 7th October, 2006 nearly one year after the applicant’s appeal was summarily rejected.
The applicant has explained that the delay was due to lack of proper legal counsel.
I have considered all the circumstances of the case.
The applicant has been convicted of a capital offence. It is just that since the applicant has been sentenced to death he should be allowed to appeal to this Court more so when the Republic is not opposing the application and when also the applicant’s co-accused has been allowed to appeal out of time from a similar order of the superior court.
In the circumstances, I allow the application. I extend the time for lodging the Notice of Appeal. The Notice of Appeal lodged on 17th February, 2006 is deemed as filed within time.
Dated and delivered at Nakuru this 26th day of February, 2007.
E.M. GITHINJI
…………………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR