[2014] KEELRC 222 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 222 (KLR)

The court found that the parties had reached a lawful and adequate settlement by consent, with the claimant receiving Kshs.50,000 in full discharge of all claims, including notice pay, pro-rata leave, public holidays compensation, underpayments, and a certificate of service. The court was satisfied that the consent...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEELRC 222 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Joseph Nalianya Wanyonyi; Respondent: Eppic Enterprises Limited; Respondent: Jamal Mohamed
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 166(B) of 2014
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Settlement by Consent Before Judgment
Outcome
Claim settled by consent; dispute marked as settled.
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Unlawful Termination, Settlement by Consent, Notice Pay, Leave Entitlement, Underpayment of Wages
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Unlawful Termination Settlement by Consent Notice Pay Leave Entitlement Underpayment of Wages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Nalianya Wanyonyi

Claimant

Eppic Enterprises Limited

Respondent

Jamal Mohamed

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Settlement by Consent Before Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the claimant's employment was unfair and unlawful.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to the claimed terminal dues and compensation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the parties had reached a lawful and adequate settlement by consent, with the claimant receiving Kshs.50,000 in full discharge of all claims, including notice pay, pro-rata leave, public holidays compensation, underpayments, and a certificate of service. The court was satisfied that the consent was regular, voluntary, and in accordance with the law. Consequently, the dispute was marked as settled on the agreed terms, and no further orders were made regarding costs.

Court Disposition

Claim settled by consent; dispute marked as settled.

Orders

  • The dispute is marked as settled in terms of the proposals made by the parties.
  • There shall be no order on costs.