[2015] KEELC 7 (KLR)

[2015] KEELC 7 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that he is the registered proprietor of the suit land and that the defendants had unlawfully entered, trespassed, and interfered with the property. The court relied on the Land Registration Act, specifically sections 24, 25, and 26, which...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELC 7 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Joseph Ng'ang'a Waikwa; Defendant: Jane Wambui; Defendant: Samwel Gitonga; Defendant: Wilson K. Ng'ang'a; Defendant: Peter Mburu
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 181 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment After Formal Proof; Defendants Failed to Enter Appearance or File Defence
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff; permanent injunction, eviction, demolition orders granted; costs to the plaintiff.
Judges
A Ombwayo
Legal Topics
Trespass to Land, Ownership Disputes, Eviction Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Trespass to Land Ownership Disputes Eviction Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Ng'ang'a Waikwa

Plaintiff

Jane Wambui

Defendant

Samwel Gitonga

Defendant

Wilson K. Ng'ang'a

Defendant

Peter Mburu

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment After Formal Proof; Defendants Failed to Enter Appearance or File Defence

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the suit land and entitled to protection under the Land Registration Act.
  2. 2 Whether the defendants unlawfully trespassed, constructed, and interfered with the plaintiff's land.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction, eviction, and demolition orders against the defendants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that he is the registered proprietor of the suit land and that the defendants had unlawfully entered, trespassed, and interfered with the property. The court relied on the Land Registration Act, specifically sections 24, 25, and 26, which confer absolute and indefeasible ownership to the registered proprietor, subject only to specific statutory exceptions. The defendants, having failed to enter appearance or file a defence, did not challenge the plaintiff's evidence or title. The court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to protection of his proprietary rights, and granted a permanent injunction, eviction,...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff; permanent injunction, eviction, demolition orders granted; costs to the plaintiff.

Orders

  • A permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their agents and/or servants from re-entering, trespassing, ploughing, constructing, or in any other manner dealing with land parcel number Moi's Bridge/Ziwa Block 16 (Chebarus)/151.
  • An order of eviction against the defendants from the suit property.