[1983] KEHC 12 (KLR)
The court found that the evidence did not establish the necessary intention to steal the motor vehicle, as the vehicle was found only 100 metres from where it had been parked. Even accepting the prosecution witnesses' evidence, the facts did not support a finding of theft as defined by law. The conviction was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1983] KEHC 12 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Joseph Njuguna Kamau; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 23 of 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside
- Legal Topics
- Stealing Motor Vehicle, Elements of Theft, Intent to Steal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Njuguna Kamau
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the evidence established the offence of stealing a motor vehicle contrary to section 278A of the Penal Code.
- 2 Whether the appellant had the requisite intention to steal the motor vehicle.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the evidence did not establish the necessary intention to steal the motor vehicle, as the vehicle was found only 100 metres from where it had been parked. Even accepting the prosecution witnesses' evidence, the facts did not support a finding of theft as defined by law. The conviction was therefore unsafe and could not stand.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside
Orders
- Conviction quashed.
- Sentence set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 23 OF 1983
(From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No.1208 of 1982 of the District Magistrate's Court at Kikuyu KamauNjuguna Esq.)
JOSEPH NJUGUNA KAMAU ........... ....... ....……………......... APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC…………………………………………………………….RESPONDENT
CORAM: O'Kubasu (J)
Appellant absent, not wishing to be present and unrepresented.
A R. Rebelo (Senior State Counsel.) for Respondent
JUDGMENT
The appellant was convicted on a charge of stealing of a motor vehicle contrary to section 278A of the Penal Code and sentenced to 12 months imprisonment plus S strokes of the cane. The appellant now appeals against both conviction add sentence.
The learned Senior state Counsel (Mr,. Rebelo) did not support conviction
The evidence on record shows that the vehicle in question was found only 100 metres from where it had been parked. Even if the evidence of PW5 and PW4 had to be accepted it is clear that an intention to steal had not been made out.
Perhaps the appellant might have been charged with attempted theft of motor vehicle.
In view of the foregoing this appeal is allowed, conviction quashed and sentence set aside. The appellant (if still in prison) is to be released immediately unless otherwise lawfully held. Order accordingly.
Delivered at Nairobi this 8th day of November, 1983.
E O’KUBASU
JUDGE