[2016] KEHC 862 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 862 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case for the grant of an injunction, as he had purchased and occupied the land since 1999 and faced the risk of irreparable loss if the defendant disposed of the property. The defendant's admission of the sale and the plaintiff's occupation further...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 862 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Joseph Ntongai M'Alabwa; Defendant: John Michubu M'Nguthari
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 242 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Land and Environment Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Inhibition
Outcome
Interlocutory injunction and inhibition granted in favour of the plaintiff pending determination of the main suit.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Injunctions, Land Sale Disputes, Adjudication Sections, Inhibition Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Injunctions Land Sale Disputes Adjudication Sections Inhibition Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Ntongai M'Alabwa

Plaintiff

John Michubu M'Nguthari

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Environment Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Inhibition

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a temporary and permanent injunction restraining the defendant from disposing of Parcel No. 5036 Kangeta Adjudication Section pending determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether an inhibition order should be registered to prevent dealings with the suit land until the suit is heard and determined.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case for the grant of an injunction, as he had purchased and occupied the land since 1999 and faced the risk of irreparable loss if the defendant disposed of the property. The defendant's admission of the sale and the plaintiff's occupation further supported the plaintiff's case. The court held that the orders sought were necessary to preserve the subject matter of the suit and prevent injustice. Accordingly, the court granted an injunctive order restraining the defendant and those claiming under him from selling, transferring, or otherwise disposing of the suit land pending the hearing and determination of the main suit....

Court Disposition

Interlocutory injunction and inhibition granted in favour of the plaintiff pending determination of the main suit.

Orders

  • An injunctive order is issued restraining the defendant, his agents, assigns and those claiming under him from selling, transferring and/or otherwise disposing of the parcel of Land No. 5036 Kangeta Adjudication Section pending the hearing and determination of the main suit.
  • An order of inhibition be registered against Land Parcel No. 5036 Kangeta Adjudication Section or against any land parcel registered under any name or number emanating from Land Parcel No. 5036 Kangeta Adjudication Section.