[2007] KEHC 1810 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 1810 (KLR)

The court found that the omission of the surname 'M’Imanyara' in the certificate of confirmation of grant for both the applicant and the respondent constituted an error that is curable under Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act. The court further noted that the certificate as issued was incomplete and that this...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEHC 1810 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joseph Nturibi M’Imanyara; Respondent: Margaret Kaninkio M’Imanyara
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Succession Cause 236 of 1999
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Amend Certificate of Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
Application granted. Certificate of confirmation to be amended to correct parties' names and rectify incompleteness.
Legal Topics
Succession, Amendment of Grant, Correction of Errors, Estate Administration
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Amendment of Grant Correction of Errors Estate Administration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Nturibi M’Imanyara

Applicant

Margaret Kaninkio M’Imanyara

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Amend Certificate of Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the omission of the parties' full names in the certificate of confirmation of grant can be corrected under Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act.
  2. 2 Whether the certificate of confirmation as issued is incomplete and requires rectification.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the omission of the surname 'M’Imanyara' in the certificate of confirmation of grant for both the applicant and the respondent constituted an error that is curable under Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act. The court further noted that the certificate as issued was incomplete and that this omission should also be rectified. Accordingly, the court granted the application to amend the certificate of confirmation to reflect the correct names and ordered that the incompleteness of the certificate be corrected as well. No order as to costs was made.

Court Disposition

Application granted. Certificate of confirmation to be amended to correct parties' names and rectify incompleteness.

Orders

  • The names of the objector/applicant and the petitioner in the certificate of confirmation of grant shall be corrected as suggested in (a) of the Notice of Motion dated 20th April, 2006.
  • The omission rendering the certificate of confirmation incomplete shall be rectified.