[2018] KEHC 5273 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 5273 (KLR)

The court found that the reasons advanced by the applicants' counsel for failing to attend court were justified, specifically that the counsel holding brief was not present when the matter was called out. The court determined that the interests of justice required the reinstatement of the application to allow for a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 5273 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joseph Obura Nyangaga; Applicant: Hudson Kariuki Nguuro; Applicant: Anwar Aliislam; Respondent: Resident Magistrate’s/County Court, Mombasa; Respondent: The D.P.P.; Interested Party: Amirali Hassanali Mohamed
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review 10 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Motion
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Reinstatement of Application, Dismissal for Non Attendance, Judicial Review Orders, Leave to Apply for Certiorari, Stay of Proceedings
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Administrative Law Reinstatement of Application Dismissal for Non Attendance Judicial Review Orders Leave to Apply for Certiorari Stay of Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Obura Nyangaga

Applicant

Hudson Kariuki Nguuro

Applicant

Anwar Aliislam

Applicant

Resident Magistrate’s/County Court, Mombasa

Respondent

The D.P.P.

Respondent

Amirali Hassanali Mohamed

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Motion

  1. 1 Whether the dismissal of the applicants' motion for want of prosecution and/or non-attendance should be set aside and the application reinstated.
  2. 2 Whether the failure to attend court by the applicants' counsel was justified and excusable.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the reasons advanced by the applicants' counsel for failing to attend court were justified, specifically that the counsel holding brief was not present when the matter was called out. The court determined that the interests of justice required the reinstatement of the application to allow for a fair determination of the substantive issues raised in the main motion. The affidavit by one applicant raising issues about authority to file the suit was noted as a matter for the main application, not for the procedural reinstatement. Accordingly, the court allowed the application to set aside the dismissal and reinstated the motion for hearing.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion application dated 6th April, 2018 is allowed as prayed with costs in the cause.