[2015] KEHC 8476 (KLR)
The court found that while the offence was aggravated by the unprovoked nature of the attack and the use of a weapon, the appellant's status as a first offender and his remorse were significant mitigating factors. The original sentence of 5 years imprisonment, though within the law, was deemed excessive in light of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 8476 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Joseph Odhiambo Mbori; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Homa Bay
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 119 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- sentence reduced
- Judges
- DAS Majanja
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Review, Grievous Harm, Plea of Guilty
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Odhiambo Mbori
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 5 years imprisonment for causing grievous harm was harsh or excessive.
- 2 Whether mitigating factors warranted a reduction of sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the offence was aggravated by the unprovoked nature of the attack and the use of a weapon, the appellant's status as a first offender and his remorse were significant mitigating factors. The original sentence of 5 years imprisonment, though within the law, was deemed excessive in light of these mitigating circumstances. The court exercised its discretion to reduce the sentence to one year imprisonment, balancing the seriousness of the offence with the appellant's personal circumstances and remorse.
Court Disposition
sentence reduced
Orders
- The sentence of 5 years imprisonment is set aside and substituted with a sentence of one year imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT AT HOMA BAY
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 119 OF 2014
(FORMERLY KISII HCCRA NO. 108 OF 2012)
BETWEEN
JOSEPH ODHIAMBO MBORI ………………..…................……… APPELLANT
AND
REPUBLIC …………………….……………………………….… RESPONDENT
(Being an appeal from the original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No. 218 of 2012 at the Principal Magistrates Court at Rongo, Hon. Z. J. Nyakundi, SRM dated on 24th April 2012)
JUDGMENT
1. The appellant, JOSEPH ODHIAMBO MBORI was charged with and convicted on his own plea of guilty of the offence of causing grievous harm contrary to section 234 of the Penal Code (Chapter 63 of the Laws of Kenya).He was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment. After conviction and sentence, he was released on bail pending appeal by the learned magistrate. He disappeared and was apprehended only when this court issued a warrant of arrest.
2. The facts of the offence were that on 18th April, 2012 at South Kamwango sub-location, North Kamagambo location within Migori District, one Mary Akinyi, the complainant, went to the appellant’s house to demand a debt of Kshs. 200/= from his wife. On arrival, the appellant’s wife referred the complainant to him and without any reason he attacked the complainant while armed with a blunt object. The complainant escaped and reported the matter to Kamagambo Police Station where she was issued with a P3 form. She suffered had swollen bruises on the face and complained of difficulties in her vision. The clinical officer who treated her at Rongo District Hospital recorded the injuries and noted that she had tenderness on the back and chest and classified the injury as main.
3. The appellant appealed against the conviction and sentence. At the hearing of this appeal, the appellant stated that he did not contest the conviction but that he wished the court to review the sentence as he was remorseful for what he had done.
4. Mr Oluoch, learned counsel for the respondent, opposed the appeal on sentence on the ground that the learned magistrate took into account relevant factors, did not take into account irrelevant factors and given the fact that the assault was unprovoked and a weapon used, the sentence of 5 years imprisonment was neither harsh nor excessive.
5. I have considered the facts of the case, the weapon used, the injuries inflicted and the unprovoked nature of the attack which are aggravating factors. That the appellant was a first offender and he is now remorseful are factors in his favour.
6. In all circumstances, I reduce the sentence to one year imprisonment.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED at HOMA BAY this 12th day of June 2015.
D.S MAJANJA
JUDGE
Appellant in person.
Mr Oluoch, Senior Assistant Director of Public Prosecutions, instructed by the Office of Director of Public Prosecutions for the respondent.