[2006] KEHC 1069 (KLR)
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain or grant an application for relief from payment of court fees and security in respect of an intended appeal to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal Rules define 'court' as the Court of Appeal or its divisions, and only that court can exercise the relevant powers....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 1069 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Joseph Odingo Ogola; Respondent: Victoria Commercial Bank
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 467 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Relief From Fees and Security Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application struck out for want of jurisdiction.
- Judges
- DK Musinga
- Legal Topics
- Court Fees, Leave to Appeal, Jurisdiction, Relief From Security
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Odingo Ogola
Applicant
Victoria Commercial Bank
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Relief From Fees and Security Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to grant relief from payment of court fees and security for an intended appeal to the Court of Appeal.
- 2 Whether the application for leave to file an appeal without full payment of assessed court fees is properly before the High Court.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain or grant an application for relief from payment of court fees and security in respect of an intended appeal to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal Rules define 'court' as the Court of Appeal or its divisions, and only that court can exercise the relevant powers. Consequently, the application before the High Court is incompetent and must be struck out for want of jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Application struck out for want of jurisdiction.
Orders
- The application is struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
Misc Civ 467 of 2006
JOSEPH ODINGO OGOLA………..................................................……………..APPLICANT
VERSUS
VICTORIA COMMERCIAL BANK…...................................................……...RESPONDENT
RULING
The applicant filed an exparte application under Rule 112 of the Court of Appeal Rules and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act. In the said application he urged the court to grant leave for an order of relief from fees and security in filing and lodging the record of appeal in an intended appeal from a decree in Nakuru HCCC No.324 of 1999 without paying the whole amount of Kshs.107,400/- which had been assessed as the court fees payable for the intended appeal.
In his affidavit in support of the said application he stated that on 5th May 2006 this court delivered a judgment wherein it ordered the respondent to pay him a sum of Kshs.2,600,000/- plus interest at court rates from the date of the judgment that is 5th May 2006 until the date of full payment. The applicant was ordered to pay the respondent a sum of Kshs.400,000/- and interest at court rates from 14th September 1993 upto the date of full payment. The court also awarded costs to the applicant. The applicant was aggrieved by the said judgment and instructed his advocates to file an appeal against the same. The filing fees for the intended appeal was assessed at Kshs.107,400/- but the plaintiff was not in a position to raise the said amount in view of the short notice that he was required to pay before the statutory period for filing the appeal lapsed. He said he was able to raise only Kshs.20,000/- and offered to pay the balance of the assessed court fees within a period of ninety days. He therefore urged the court to allow him to lodge the record of appeal without paying the full amount as hereinabove stated.
I am convinced that the application before this court is incompetent as the same can only be made before the Court of Appeal. In the Court of Appeal rules the word “court” is defined to mean “the Court of Appeal and includes a division thereof and a single judge exercising any power vested in him sitting alone”. This court therefore lacks jurisdiction to consider the application aforesaid and I strike out the same.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at Nakuru this 5th day of October, 2006.
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE
Ruling delivered in open court in the presence of Mr. Cheche for the applicant.
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE