[2006] KEHC 602 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 602 (KLR)

The court found that both the Mumias Land Disputes Tribunal and the Appeals Committee acted outside their statutory jurisdiction by purporting to determine ownership and order transfer of land registered under the Registered Land Act. Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act does not confer such powers....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] KEHC 602 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Joseph Okwomi Okwendo; Respondent: Sofia Keya Ayuka
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 25 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal, Registered Land Act, Appeals Committee Powers, Title to Land
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal Registered Land Act Appeals Committee Powers Title to Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Okwomi Okwendo

Appellant

Sofia Keya Ayuka

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Land Disputes Tribunal and Appeals Committee had jurisdiction to determine ownership and order transfer of registered land titles.
  2. 2 Whether the decisions of the Tribunal and Appeals Committee were nullities for want of jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that both the Mumias Land Disputes Tribunal and the Appeals Committee acted outside their statutory jurisdiction by purporting to determine ownership and order transfer of land registered under the Registered Land Act. Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act does not confer such powers. Consequently, their decisions were nullities for want of jurisdiction. The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside both decisions, and ordered that each party bear its own costs.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • The decision of the Appeals Committee in Appeal Committee case No. 126 of 1999 is set aside.
  • The decision of the Mumias Land Disputes Tribunal in Land Case No. 2 of 1999 is set aside.