[2017] KEPPDT 19 (KLR)

[2017] KEPPDT 19 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the 2nd Respondent had demonstrated compliance with the internal dispute resolution mechanism as required by section 40(2) of the Political Parties Act, thereby conferring jurisdiction on the Tribunal. Upon examining the evidence, the Tribunal determined that the applicant's reliance on a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEPPDT 19 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joseph Oluoch Awuor; Respondent: Orange Democratic Movement; Respondent: William Kinyanyi Onyango
Court
Political Parties Disputes Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Complaint 141 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Judgment
Outcome
complaint dismissed; 2nd Respondent declared nominee
Legal Topics
Party Nominations, Internal Dispute Resolution, Jurisdiction of Tribunal, Nomination Certificates
Source Language
en
Election Petitions Administrative Law Party Nominations Internal Dispute Resolution Jurisdiction of Tribunal Nomination Certificates

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Oluoch Awuor

Applicant

Orange Democratic Movement

Respondent

William Kinyanyi Onyango

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Election Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction in accordance with section 40(2) of the Political Parties Act No. 11 of 2011.
  2. 2 Whether it is the Claimant or the 2nd Respondent who is the 1st Respondent’s duly nominated candidate for the position of Member of County Assembly for Yala Township, Siaya County.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the 2nd Respondent had demonstrated compliance with the internal dispute resolution mechanism as required by section 40(2) of the Political Parties Act, thereby conferring jurisdiction on the Tribunal. Upon examining the evidence, the Tribunal determined that the applicant's reliance on a tally signed only by himself was insufficient to conclusively establish his victory, especially since other aspirants did not sign the tally. In contrast, the 2nd Respondent provided both interim and final nomination certificates issued by the 1st Respondent, substantiating his claim. The Tribunal concluded that the applicant failed to prove he was the winner, while the 2nd...

Court Disposition

complaint dismissed; 2nd Respondent declared nominee

Orders

  • The 2nd Respondent is declared as the 1st Respondent’s nominee for the position of Member of County Assembly, Yala Township, Siaya County.
  • The 2nd Respondent shall serve this decision forthwith on the 1st Respondent, and a notification shall issue to the Independent Electoral Boundaries Commission accordingly.