[2022] KEELC 495 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 495 (KLR)

The court found that the order issued on 08/02/2019 in Kisii Succession Cause No. 240 of 2014 did not provide for automatic revocation of the grant ad litem upon expiry of the 30-day period for taking out citation proceedings. Instead, the order required further action by the Succession Court to declare the grant...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 495 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Joseph Ombati Nyamwembe (Suing as administrator of estate of Oigoro Nyamike, deceased); Defendant: Joseph Mogeni Nyangweso
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 28 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Validity of Grant Ad Litem
Outcome
preliminary objection dismissed
Judges
CM Kamau
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Succession Proceedings, Title Cancellation, Administrator Powers
Source Language
en
Land and Property Revocation of Grant Succession Proceedings Title Cancellation Administrator Powers

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Ombati Nyamwembe (Suing as administrator of estate of Oigoro Nyamike, deceased)

Plaintiff

Joseph Mogeni Nyangweso

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Validity of Grant Ad Litem

  1. 1 Whether the grant ad litem issued to the plaintiff had lapsed or been revoked due to non-compliance with a prior court order.
  2. 2 Whether the suit should be struck out for want of locus standi if the grant ad litem is deemed revoked.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the order issued on 08/02/2019 in Kisii Succession Cause No. 240 of 2014 did not provide for automatic revocation of the grant ad litem upon expiry of the 30-day period for taking out citation proceedings. Instead, the order required further action by the Succession Court to declare the grant revoked if the condition was not met. Since there was no evidence that the Succession Court had made such a declaration or order of revocation, the grant ad litem remained in force. Consequently, the plaintiff retained locus standi to prosecute the suit, and the preliminary objection seeking to strike out the suit for want of locus standi was not sustainable at this stage.

Court Disposition

preliminary objection dismissed

Orders

  • The preliminary objection is dismissed.
  • The suit shall proceed to hearing on merits.