[2018] KEHC 1899 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 1899 (KLR)

The court found that the application for leave to file a second appeal out of time was brought after an inordinate delay of nearly three years from the date of the judgment. The applicant failed to provide sufficient reasons for the delay and did not demonstrate that the intended appeal raised any questions of law...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 1899 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joseph Ombure Oruno; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 65 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Appeal Out of Time, Delay in Filing, Second Appeal Requirements
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Appeal Out of Time Delay in Filing Second Appeal Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Ombure Oruno

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the application for leave to file a second appeal out of time should be granted.
  2. 2 Whether sufficient reasons have been advanced for the delay in filing the appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the intended second appeal raises questions of law for consideration.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for leave to file a second appeal out of time was brought after an inordinate delay of nearly three years from the date of the judgment. The applicant failed to provide sufficient reasons for the delay and did not demonstrate that the intended appeal raised any questions of law for consideration. Furthermore, there was no evidence of pauperism to justify any leniency. As a result, the court dismissed the application for failing to meet the threshold for extension of time under the applicable legal principles.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 7/9/2018 is rejected and dismissed.