[2022] KEELC 1922 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 1922 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to attach any evidence, such as a land search or a copy of the inhibition order, to prove the existence of the inhibition over the subject land. Without such documentation, the court was unable to verify the existence, particulars, or the originating court and case number of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 1922 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Joseph Riungu M’Kirika (Sued as the administrator of the estate of N’Kirika M’Nanjau); Respondent: Gerald Ntari M’Mutea (Sued as the administrator of the estate of M’Ritara M’Tuambae)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 56 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Elc Appeal / Ruling on Application to Lift Inhibition
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Inhibition Orders, Land Registration, Appeal Determination
Source Language
en
Land and Property Inhibition Orders Land Registration Appeal Determination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Riungu M’Kirika (Sued as the administrator of the estate of N’Kirika M’Nanjau)

Appellant

Gerald Ntari M’Mutea (Sued as the administrator of the estate of M’Ritara M’Tuambae)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Elc Appeal / Ruling on Application to Lift Inhibition

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to warrant the lifting of the inhibition order over L.R No. Abothuguchi/Nkamie/828.
  2. 2 Whether the court can lift an inhibition order without proof of its existence and particulars.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to attach any evidence, such as a land search or a copy of the inhibition order, to prove the existence of the inhibition over the subject land. Without such documentation, the court was unable to verify the existence, particulars, or the originating court and case number of the inhibition order. As a result, the court held that the application lacked merit and dismissed it, emphasizing that parties seeking such relief must provide adequate supporting evidence.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 28.7.2021 is dismissed for lack of merits.