[2010] KEHC 2487 (KLR)
The court found that the entry of interlocutory judgment was irregular because the relief sought was not for a liquidated demand or detention of goods, but for cancellation of title deeds, which requires formal proof. Furthermore, the plaintiff misled the court regarding the defendant's residence, claiming she lived...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 2487 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Josephat Mwaura Thuo; Defendant: Loise Wambui Kahenya
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 38 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment on Application to Set Aside Interlocutory Judgment
- Outcome
- Interlocutory judgment and subsequent proceedings set aside; plaintiff to effect proper service on the defendant.
- Judges
- SP Ouko
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Judgment, Service of Process, Title Cancellation, Default Judgment, Formal Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Josephat Mwaura Thuo
Plaintiff
Loise Wambui Kahenya
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment on Application to Set Aside Interlocutory Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interlocutory judgment was regularly entered in a claim seeking cancellation of title deeds and reversion of land ownership.
- 2 Whether the defendant was properly served with court process given her residence outside Kenya.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff misled the court regarding the defendant's whereabouts.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the entry of interlocutory judgment was irregular because the relief sought was not for a liquidated demand or detention of goods, but for cancellation of title deeds, which requires formal proof. Furthermore, the plaintiff misled the court regarding the defendant's residence, claiming she lived in Nakuru while evidence showed she resided in the United States. The plaintiff failed to properly serve the defendant, rendering the interlocutory judgment and subsequent proceedings invalid. The court set aside the interlocutory judgment and ordered the plaintiff to effect proper service on the defendant.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory judgment and subsequent proceedings set aside; plaintiff to effect proper service on the defendant.
Orders
- Interlocutory judgment and subsequent proceedings are set aside.
- Plaintiff to properly effect service on the defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU
Civil Case 38 of 2009
JOSEPHAT MWAURA THUO……………………PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
LOISE WAMBUI KAHENYA...………………..DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
The plaintiff instituted this suit against the defendant, his daughter, seeking a cancellation of two title deeds in respect of L.R. No.NAKURU/BAHATI/329 and NAKURU/BAHATI/217, both registered in the name of the defendant.He also seeks that both titles be reverted to his name.
On 17th September, 2009, the plaintiff obtained interlocutory judgment in default of appearance and proceeded to adduce evidence in support of his claim by way of formal proof.His advocate has also filed written submissions.
It is always incumbent upon a party alleging the existence of certain facts to prove them, whether or not the matter is defended.The law on entry of interlocutory judgment is clear.Order 9A of the Civil Procedure Rules provides that interlocutory judgment in default of appearance can be entered in respect only of a liquidated demand or in a claim for detention of goods.
Order 9A rule 8of the Civil Procedure Rules provides that:
“8. Subject to rule 3, in all suits not otherwise specifically provided for by this Order, where any party served does not appear the plaintiff may set down the suit for hearing under Order 1XB rule 1”
The plaintiff instead of obtaining interlocutory judgment ought to have satisfied the court that the defendant has been duly served but failed to appear.Thereafter, the suit would be set down for hearing.
The procedure was explained in the case of Mint Holdings Ltd. & Samson N. Keengu Vs. Trust Bank, Civil Appeal No.249 of 1999
In that case, the court stated that:
“As pointed out, there was no liquidated demand.Judgment could only have been entered upon a formal proof.The entry of such interlocutory judgment was irregular as Order IXA of the Civil Procedure Rules does not cater for entering of an interlocutory judgment when the nature of reliefs sought requires formal proof.”
The entry of interlocutory judgment in this matter was irregular.Secondly, the pleadings fail to disclose a fundamental fact; that the defendant lives in theUnited States of America.This fact only came out during the hearing.It was incumbent upon the plaintiff to demonstrate that the defendant was duly served.
The plaint at paragraph 2 states:
“ 2. The defendant is a female adult individualof sound mind residing within Nakuru……”
In an application dated 27th March, 2009, the plaintiff sought leave to serve the defendant by way of substituted means.In the affidavit in support of the application, the plaintiff averred as follows:
“5. THAT after looking for her in vain, I send(sic) somebody to apply for official searchfor me at Nakuru lands office.
6. THAT after receiving the official search Idiscovered that she has transferred all mytwo (sic) parcels of land indicated hereinand vanished to unknown destination.”
But in his testimony, the plaintiff and his witnesses, another daughter, Dorothy Nyokabi Kimani confirmed that the defendant has all along lived in theUnited States of Americaand only returned toKenyain May, 2008 when the transfer of one property was effected.It is therefore clear that the plaintiff deliberately misled the court in order to enter an interlocutory judgment and service was itself irregular.
Pursuant to Order IXA rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the interlocutory judgment and subsequent proceedings are set aside.The plaintiff to properly effect service on the defendant.
Orders accordingly.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Nakuru this 30th day of April, 2010.
W. OUKO
JUDGE