[2020] KEHC 421 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had not demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant the grant of conservatory orders. The balance of convenience tilted in favour of allowing the County Assembly of Kitui to continue discharging its constitutional mandate, rather than restraining it. The court noted that any...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 421 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Josephine Kavivi Mutie & 13 Others; Respondent: County Assembly of Kitui; Respondent: The Speaker, County Assembly of Kitui
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kitui
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition E002 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- BB Limo
- Legal Topics
- Conservatory Orders, Balance of Convenience, County Government Powers, Injunctive Relief
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Josephine Kavivi Mutie & 13 Others
Applicant
County Assembly of Kitui
Respondent
The Speaker, County Assembly of Kitui
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to conservatory orders restraining the respondents from implementing the resolution constituting various House Committees in the County Assembly of Kitui.
- 2 Whether the balance of convenience favours granting the injunctive relief sought by the applicants.
- 3 Whether the applicants will suffer irreparable harm if the orders are not granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had not demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant the grant of conservatory orders. The balance of convenience tilted in favour of allowing the County Assembly of Kitui to continue discharging its constitutional mandate, rather than restraining it. The court noted that any prejudice or damages suffered by the applicants were primarily monetary and could be compensated if the petition ultimately succeeded. Furthermore, the application was considered premature in light of ongoing internal processes within the County Assembly, as evidenced by the letter requesting the Minority Party Whip to submit names for committee appointments. Granting the orders...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application dated 12th October 2020 is disallowed for want of merit.
- Detailed reasons for the ruling are reserved to 19th January 2021.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KITUI
PETITION NO. E002 OF 2020
IN THE MATTER OF: ARTICLES 1,2,3,10,20,21,22,23,27,47,65,174,176,
AND 259 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA
AND
IN THE MATTER OF: VIOLATION AND FURTHER CONTINUING
VIOLATION OF THE PETITIONERS’ FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS;
AND
IN THE MATTER OF SETION 9 AND 14 OF THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT CT NO.17 OF 2012
AND
IN THE MATTER OF: STANDING ORDERS OF KITUI COUNTY ASSEMBLY NOS 152, 154, 156 AND 179
BETWEEN
JOSEPHINE KAVIVI MUTIE & 13 OTHERS............................PETITIONERS
VERSUS
(1) COUNTY ASSEMBLY OF KITUI
(2) THE SPEAKER, COUNTY ASSEMBLY OF KITUI..........RESPONDENTS
R U L I N G
1. This court has considered the Notice of Motion dated 12th October, 2020, the grounds upon which it has been brought and the submissions filed. I have also considered the response made by Respondents through a Replying Affidavit sworn by Leader of Majority Kitui County Assembly, Hon.Peter Mwikya Kilonzo on 21st October, 2020.
2. The Applicants are seeking conservatory orders to restrain the Respondents from implementing the Resolution of 1st Respondent (County Assembly of Kitui) made on 7th October 2020 constituting various House Committees in the County Assembly of Kitui. The Applicants are also seeking orders of status quo in the Kitui County Assembly Committees as constituted before 7th October, 2020.
3. This Court for reasons that had already been explained to both counsels, is constrained on time and has for the interest of justice decided to give its verdict based on what has been placed the court and reserve its detailed reasons to a later date. Towards that end this court has found no merit in the application dated 12th October, 2020. A brief summary of what has swayed the court’s mind are as follows:
(i) The relief sought is an injunctive relief and the balance of convenience weighs or tilts in favour of allowing the County Assembly of Kitui to discharge its mandate/duties as provided for in the Constitution of Kenya 2010 rather than restraining them.
(ii) Any prejudice/damages, if any, suffered by the Applicants are mainly monetary and hence quantifiable which can easily be compensated by way of damages if they are successful in the petition pending in herein.
(iii) The application dated 12th October 2020 appears premature in the face of a letter dated 16th October 2020 exhibited by the Respondents addressed to the Minority Party Whip asking the said leader to forward the names of 24 Members of Kitui County Assembly to serve in 15 various committees.
In the end this court finds that granting conservatory orders in the manner sought by the Applicant has the prospect of causing a stand still in the County Assembly of Kitui by stopping them from discharging their mandate/duties to the detriment of “wanjiku”. The application dated 12th October 2020 is disallowed for want of merit. The reasoning of this court is reserved to the 19th of January 2021 as this court is proceeding for leave as from the 16th November, 2020 which means that today the 13th November, 2020 is actually the last day this term.
Dated, Signedand Delivered at Kitui this 13th day of November, 2020.
R. K. LIMO
JUDGE