[2017] KEHC 3679 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 3679 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff/applicant, through counsel, sought to withdraw the Notice of Motion for interim conservatory and injunctive orders. Citing the Supreme Court decision in Council of Governors v. Senate & Another (2014) eKLR and Article 159(2)(c) of the Constitution, the court held that a party has...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 3679 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Joshua Aguya Odando; Defendant: Lukas Adika Odenyo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Migori
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 63 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Withdrawal of Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application for withdrawal of Notice of Motion allowed; no order as to costs.
Judges
GMA Ongondo
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Withdrawal of Application, Joint Proprietorship, Eviction Proceedings
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Interlocutory Injunctions Withdrawal of Application Joint Proprietorship Eviction Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joshua Aguya Odando

Plaintiff

Lukas Adika Odenyo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Withdrawal of Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff/applicant is entitled to interim conservatory and injunctive orders over land parcel KAMAGAMBO/KABUORO/1927 pending determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the application for withdrawal of the Notice of Motion should be allowed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff/applicant, through counsel, sought to withdraw the Notice of Motion for interim conservatory and injunctive orders. Citing the Supreme Court decision in Council of Governors v. Senate & Another (2014) eKLR and Article 159(2)(c) of the Constitution, the court held that a party has the liberty to withdraw an application, and such withdrawal is in line with the promotion of alternative dispute resolution. The court further noted that Order 25 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, provides the procedural framework for withdrawal. Accordingly, the court allowed the withdrawal of the application, finding it merited, and made no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

Application for withdrawal of Notice of Motion allowed; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 11/11/2016 is withdrawn.
  • No order as to costs.