[2020] KEELC 150 (KLR)
The court found that although the delay of almost four months in filing the appeal was inordinate, the prevailing circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic had disrupted normal activities, which the court took judicial notice of. The applicants were given the benefit of the doubt and granted leave to file the appeal...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELC 150 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Joshua Kaburu Kimathi; Applicant: Simon Gitonga M’Kiome; Respondent: Evangeline Kangwene
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E001 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal out of time allowed; stay of execution declined; costs awarded to respondent.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Trust Land, Delay in Filing, Stay of Execution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joshua Kaburu Kimathi
Applicant
Simon Gitonga M’Kiome
Applicant
Evangeline Kangwene
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have provided sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether leave to appeal out of time should be granted to the applicants.
- 3 Whether a stay of execution should be granted pending appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the delay of almost four months in filing the appeal was inordinate, the prevailing circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic had disrupted normal activities, which the court took judicial notice of. The applicants were given the benefit of the doubt and granted leave to file the appeal out of time, as the court considered it just to allow them to ventilate their case before the superior court. However, the court declined to grant a stay of execution, noting that the prayer for stay was only mentioned in the affidavit and not in the body of the application. Costs were awarded to the respondent.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal out of time allowed; stay of execution declined; costs awarded to respondent.
Orders
- Applicants granted leave to file an appeal within 14 days from the date of delivery of this ruling.
- Stay of execution is declined at this stage.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT MERU
ELC MISC CASE NO. E001 OF 2020
JOSHUA KABURU KIMATHI...............................................................1ST APPLICANT
SIMON GITONGA M’KIOME.............................................................2ND APPLICANT
VERSUS
EVANGELINE KANGWENE....................................................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. Before me is a notice of motion brought pursuant to provisions of Section 1A & 1B, of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 50 Rule 6 & 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules seeking leave to file an appeal out of time against the Judgement of the Senior Resident Magistrate at Githongo Law Court dated 4. 5.2020 in Githongo ELC suit No. 9 of 2017.
2. The applicant contends that the delay in filing the appeal was not intentional as they were supplied with a copy of the judgment on 18. 9.2020.
3. The respondent has opposed the application vide the replying affidavit sworn on 9. 10. 2020. The respondent contends that the delay in filing the appeal has not been explained. She further states that the suit parcels number Abothuguchi/ Kariene/3707 and 3709 are trust properties held by her husband in trust for the other family members.
4. I have considered all the issues raised herein. Section 79 (g) of the Civil Procedure Act provides as follows;
“every appeal from a subordinate court to the High Court shall be filed within a period of thirty days from the date of the decree or order appealed against, excluding from such period any time which the lower court may certify as having been requisite for the preparation and delivery of a copy of the decree or order:
5. As stated by the respondent, extension of time is not a right of a party. It is an equitable remedy; See Fahim Yasin Twaha vs Timamy Issa Abdalla & 2 Others [2015] eKLR.
6. The delay of almost 4 months is quite inordinate. However, the court takes judicial notice that these are difficult times where a health pandemic appears to have disrupted many activities. I will thus give the applicant an opportunity to ventilate his case before the superior court. However, I decline to grant any stay of execution order at this stage. After all, this prayer is only manifested in the applicant’s affidavit but not in the body of the application.
7. In the final analysis, this court grants the applicants leave to file an appeal within 14 days from the date of delivery of this ruling. The costs herein are awarded to the respondent.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020
HON. LUCY. N. MBUGUA
ELC JUDGE
ORDER
The date of delivery of this Judgment was given via a notice dated 7. 12. 2020. In light of the declaration of measures restricting court operations due to the COVID-19 pandemicand following the practice directions issued by his Lordship, the Chief Justice dated 17th March, 2020 and published in the Kenya Gazette of 17th April 2020 as Gazette Notice no.3137, this Judgment has been delivered to the parties by electronic mail. They are deemed to have waived compliance with order 21 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules which requires that all judgments and rulings be pronounced in open court
HON. LUCY N. MBUGUA
ELC JUDGE