[2021] KEHC 7785 (KLR)
The court found that although the applicant's counsel did not act with utmost diligence in following up on the matter, the failure to comply with the court's orders was not entirely his fault as he was not notified of the ruling date. The record of the court indicating both counsels were present at the delivery of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 7785 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Joshua Odipo Ondong; Respondent: South Nyanza Sugar Co Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Migori
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 22 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- RPV Wendoh
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Court Orders Compliance, Delay in Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joshua Odipo Ondong
Applicant
South Nyanza Sugar Co Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an extension of time to comply with the court's orders and ruling of 15/10/2019.
- 2 Whether the delay in complying with the court's orders was justified.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the applicant's counsel did not act with utmost diligence in following up on the matter, the failure to comply with the court's orders was not entirely his fault as he was not notified of the ruling date. The record of the court indicating both counsels were present at the delivery of the ruling was found to be incorrect and uncontroverted by the respondent. The court held that, in the circumstances, the applicant could not be faulted for the delay and that a court order was necessary to prompt the Deputy Registrar to avail the proceedings. Therefore, the application for extension of time was merited and granted.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Extension of time for compliance with the court's orders and ruling of 15/10/2019 is granted.
- The Deputy Registrar to avail the proceedings in Migori CMCC 795 OF 2005 within sixty (60) days hereof.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT AT MIGORI
Coram R. Wendoh
MIS CIVIL APPLICTAION NO. 22 OF 2019
JOSHUA ODIPO ONDONG.................................................APPLICANT
Versus
SOUTH NYANZA SUGAR CO LTD................................RESPONDENT
RULING
The applicant Joshua Odipo Ondong filed the Notice of Motion dated 6/8/2020 seeking orders that the court be pleased to extend time for compliance with the court’s orders and ruling dated 15/10/2019 and costs of the application.
The application is supported by the affidavit of the Kerario Marwa Advocate,counsel for the applicant.He deponed that he was not aware of the ruling of the court dated 15/10/2019, the reason being that the court set the ruling date for the application dated 20/3/2019 on 3/10/2019. However, the court did not sit on the said date i.e 3/10/2019 and the court clerk advised counsel that the ruling would be on notice. His office was never served with the notice and on 14/7/2020,he followed up the file and found that the ruling was delivered on 15/10/2019; that though he paid for the proceedings on 16/7/2020, the same have not been availed to him and the advocate cannot be blamed for the delay in failing to comply with the orders of 15/10/2019; and that it is in the interest of justice that the time for complying with the court’s orders of 15/10/2019 be extended.
The application was opposed and the Respondent’s Advocates filed grounds of opposition to the effect that if the orders are granted, they will be premature, disproportionate, unjust, superfluous and there is no need for them; that the application is unnecessary and will prolong litigation.
Mr. Odero added that even if the application is granted, the parties are likely to come back before this court seeking extension of time again; that the applicant has not exhausted his options and that the applicant only needs to wait for proceedings and present the application with a certificate of delay.
In reply, Mr. Mwita urged that a court order is necessary to prompt the Deputy Registrar to facilitate the preparation of the court proceedings.
I have seen the ruling of Mrima J dated 15/10/2019. It indicates that both counsel for the parties were present i.e. Mr. Kerario Marwa for the applicant and Mr. Marvin Odero for the Respondent. Mr. Kerario has deponed that he was not present in court on the day the ruling was read and not aware of the said date. Mr. Odero who is said to have been present has not controverted Mr. Kerario’s averments. It means that the quorum as recorded by the court on 15/10/2019 is incorrect.
In the court’s ruling, the Deputy Registrar was ordered to avail the proceedings within fifteen (15) days and upon receipt, the applicant was allowed ten (10) days to file and serve a Memorandum of Appeal. Mr. Kerario deponed that it is not until 14/7/2020 that he followed up on the file. By that time, the period that had been granted to the applicant to file the appeal had long expired, over nine (9) months had lapsed. I wonder why counsel took so long to follow up on the matter even if the court had said that the ruling would be on notice. In that regard, the applicant did not act diligently. The above notwithstanding, having not been informed of the delivery of the ruling, the applicant cannot be faulted for failing to comply with the court’s order of 15/10/2020. It is not known whether the court order had been served on the Deputy Registrar to prompt him to act within the fifteen (15) days. Had it been served, may be the Deputy Registrar would have called on the applicants’ counsel to collect the said proceedings.
On the Respondents’ contention that the application is unnecessary, it is my view that the Deputy Registrar can only be moved to act with alacrity to avail the proceedings if there is a court order in place. As things stand, the order of 15/10/2020 lapsed and there would be no need for the Deputy Registrar to avail the proceedings to the applicant. I find that the application is merited and I hereby
1. Grant an extension of time for compliance with the court’s orders and ruling
of 15/10/2019.
2. The Deputy Registrar to avail the proceedings in Migori CMCC 795 OF 2005 within sixty (60) days hereof.
3. Upon receipt of the proceedings, the applicant to file and serve the Record of Appeal within ten days thereof.
Costs to be in the cause.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MIGORI THIS 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021
R. WENDOH
JUDGE
Ruling delivered in the presence of:-
Mr. Odero for the Respondent
Mr. Kerario Mwita for the Applicant – Absent
Ms Oloo Court Assistant