[2025] KECPT 217 (KLR)

[2025] KECPT 217 (KLR)

The tribunal found that the claimant had sufficiently proved his membership in the respondent Sacco and the amount of his savings through unchallenged documentary evidence, specifically the statement of account showing his name and membership number. The respondent's denial was not supported by any evidence, nor did...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECPT 217 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Elisha Muatha Joshua; Respondent: Metropolitan National Sacco Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 111/E210 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for claimant
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw
Legal Topics
Sacco Member Refunds, Deposit Recovery, Burden of Proof, Society Membership Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Banking and Finance Sacco Member Refunds Deposit Recovery Burden of Proof Society Membership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elisha Muatha Joshua

Claimant

Metropolitan National Sacco Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is a member of the respondent Sacco entitled to a refund of his savings.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent owes the claimant Ksh. 118,563.23 as claimed.

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant had sufficiently proved his membership in the respondent Sacco and the amount of his savings through unchallenged documentary evidence, specifically the statement of account showing his name and membership number. The respondent's denial was not supported by any evidence, nor did it challenge the authenticity of the claimant's documents. The respondent's argument regarding an AGM resolution suspending refunds was not substantiated by any documentary proof. The tribunal held that the existence of multiple refund claims or the respondent's financial difficulties did not absolve it of its obligation to refund the claimant's savings. Consequently, judgment...

Court Disposition

judgment for claimant

Orders

  • Judgment entered in favour of the claimant for Ksh. 118,563.23.
  • Respondent to pay costs of the claim.