[2019] KEELC 1771 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 1771 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had filed a notice of appeal and brought the application for stay of execution without undue delay. The court determined that execution of the judgment before the appeal is heard would render the appeal nugatory and cause the applicants substantial loss, particularly given the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 1771 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Josiah Kafuta Mtila; Defendant: Abdulkhall Mohamed & Others
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 237 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed.
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Substantial Loss, Security for Due Performance, Compensation Funds, Right of Appeal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Substantial Loss Security for Due Performance Compensation Funds Right of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Josiah Kafuta Mtila

Plaintiff

Abdulkhall Mohamed & Others

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal under Order 42 rule 6(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants will suffer substantial loss if stay is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether security for due performance should be ordered.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had filed a notice of appeal and brought the application for stay of execution without undue delay. The court determined that execution of the judgment before the appeal is heard would render the appeal nugatory and cause the applicants substantial loss, particularly given the large sum of compensation funds involved. The court also noted that the compensation funds were still held by the National Land Commission and not in the hands of the parties, making it unnecessary and punitive to require the applicants to deposit security. Consequently, the court allowed the application for stay of execution pending appeal without ordering provision of security.

Court Disposition

Application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed.

Orders

  • Stay of execution of the judgment delivered on 7th February 2018 granted pending hearing and determination of the intended appeal.
  • No order for provision of security is made.